Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36291837›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Metabolomics by NMR Combined with Machine Learning to Predict Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response for Breast Cancer.

Marcella R Cardoso, Alex Ap Rosini Silva, Maria Cecília R Talarico, Pedro H Godoy Sanches, Maurício L Sforça, Silvana A Rocco, Luciana M Rezende, Melissa Quintero, Tassia B B C Costa, Laís R Viana and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Use of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) to Study Cancer Metabolism.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers: a metabolic perspective.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. AI Applications to Breast MRI: Today and Tomorrow.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Metabolic signature ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Marcella R CardosoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic and Breast Oncology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP-Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Campinas 13083881, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9924-478X
Alex Ap Rosini SilvaMS4Life Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry, Health Sciences Postgraduate Program, São Francisco University, Bragança Paulista 12916900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6400-5201
Maria Cecília R TalaricoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic and Breast Oncology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP-Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Campinas 13083881, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1646-9754
Pedro H Godoy SanchesMS4Life Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry, Health Sciences Postgraduate Program, São Francisco University, Bragança Paulista 12916900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6419-6343
Maurício L SforçaBrazilian Biosciences National Laboratory (LNBio), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas 13083970, SP, Brazil.
Silvana A RoccoBrazilian Biosciences National Laboratory (LNBio), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas 13083970, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4551-3443
Luciana M RezendeDepartment of Medical Genetics, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP-Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Campinas 13083887, SP, Brazil.
Melissa QuinteroLaboratory of Chemical Biology, Department of Organic Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas (UNICAMP-Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Campinas 13083862, SP, Brazil.
Tassia B B C CostaLaboratory of Chemical Biology, Department of Organic Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas (UNICAMP-Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Campinas 13083862, SP, Brazil.
Laís R VianaLaboratory of Nutrition and Cancer, Department of Structural and Functional Biology, Biology Institute, University of Campinas (UNICAMP-Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Campinas 13083862, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5913-102X
Rafael R CanevaroloDepartment of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8722-8512
Amanda C FerraciniPostgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP-Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Campinas 13083970, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9626-5227
Susana RamalhoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic and Breast Oncology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP-Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Campinas 13083881, SP, Brazil.
Junier Marrero GutierrezMS4Life Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry, Health Sciences Postgraduate Program, São Francisco University, Bragança Paulista 12916900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7950-0363
Fernando GuimarãesWomen's Hospital Prof. Dr. José Aristodemo Pinotti, Centro de Atenção Integral à Saúde da Mulher (CAISM), University of Campinas (UNICAMP-Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Campinas 13083891, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5537-972X
Ljubica TasicLaboratory of Chemical Biology, Department of Organic Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas (UNICAMP-Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Campinas 13083862, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2930-7332
Alessandra TataLaboratorio di Chimica Sperimentale, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Viale Fiume 78, 36100 Vicenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0093-7242
Luís O SarianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic and Breast Oncology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP-Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Campinas 13083881, SP, Brazil.
Leo L ChengDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129, USA.
Andreia M PorcariMS4Life Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry, Health Sciences Postgraduate Program, São Francisco University, Bragança Paulista 12916900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4244-8594
Sophie F M DerchainDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic and Breast Oncology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP-Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Campinas 13083881, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade São Francisco · BRBrazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials · BRHarvard University · USIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie · ITMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 303742/2018-6São Paulo Research Foundation 2018/24069-3São Paulo Research Foundation 2019/04314-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is offered to patients with operable or inoperable breast cancer (BC) to downstage the disease. Clinical responses to NACT may vary depending on a few known clinical and biological features, but the diversity of responses to NACT is not fully understood. In this study, 80 women had their metabolite profiles of pre-treatment sera analyzed for potential NACT response biomarker candidates in combination with immunohistochemical parameters using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR). Sixty-four percent of the patients were resistant to chemotherapy. NMR, hormonal receptors (HR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and the nuclear protein Ki67 were combined through machine learning (ML) to predict the response to NACT. Metabolites such as leucine, formate, valine, and proline, along with hormone receptor status, were discriminants of response to NACT. The glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism was found to be involved in the resistance to NACT. We obtained an accuracy in excess of 80% for the prediction of response to NACT combining metabolomic and tumor profile data. Our results suggest that NMR data can substantially enhance the prediction of response to NACT when used in combination with already known response prediction factors.

Indexed as

1H-NMRbreast neoplasmsdrug resistancemagnetic resonance spectroscopymetabolismuntargeted metabolomics

Identifiers

PMID36291837
PMCPMC9600495
OpenAlexW4306367123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.