Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36291292›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

The Effect of Coil Orientation on the Stimulation of the Pre-Supplementary Motor Area: A Combined TMS and EEG Study.

Elias P Casula, Giorgio Leodori, Jaime Ibáñez, Alberto Benussi, Vishal Rawji, Sara Tremblay, Anna Latorre, John C Rothwell, Lorenzo Rocchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical utility and prospective of TMS-EEG: Updated review from an international expert group.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elias P CasulaNon-Invasive Brain Stimulation Unit, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, 00179 Rome, Italy.
Giorgio LeodoriDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6631-6740
Jaime IbáñezDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8439-151X
Alberto BenussiNeurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8703-6940
Vishal RawjiDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7291-0204
Sara TremblayThe Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.
Anna LatorreDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
John C RothwellDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Lorenzo RocchiDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3979-156X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have demonstrated the importance of direction and intensity of the applied current when the primary motor cortex (M1) is targeted. By varying these, it is possible to stimulate different subsets of neural elements, as demonstrated by modulation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and motor behaviour. The latter involves premotor areas as well, and among them, the presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA) has recently received significant attention in the study of motor inhibition. It is possible that, similar to M1, different neuronal populations can be activated by varying the direction and intensity of TMS; however, the absence of a direct electrophysiological outcome has limited this investigation. The problem can be solved by quantifying direct cortical responses by means of combined TMS and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG). We investigated the effect of variable coil orientations (0°, 90°, 180° and 270°) and stimulation intensities (100%, 120% and 140% of resting motor threshold) on local mean field potential (LMFP), transcranial evoked potential (TEP) peaks and TMS-related spectral perturbation (TRSP) from pre-SMA stimulation. As a result, early and late LMFP and peaks were larger, with the coil handle pointing posteriorly (0°) and laterally (90°). This was true also for TRSP in the β-γ range, but, surprisingly, θ-α TRSP was larger with the coil pointing at 180°. A 90° orientation activated the right M1, as shown by MEPs elicitation, thus limiting the spatial specificity of the stimulation. These results suggest that coil orientation and stimulation intensity are critical when stimulating the pre-SMA.

Indexed as

coil directionelectroencephalographymotor evoked potentialspresupplementary motor areaTMS–EEGtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36291292
PMCPMC9599651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.