ArticleBiosensors2022
Advances in Photoplethysmography for Personalized Cardiovascular Monitoring.
Article in Biosensors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2025 Thai Hypertension Society Guidance for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Adults.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Guideline
- Article
- Feasibility of Long-Term Physical Activity Measurement With a Wearable Activity Tracker in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis: 1-Year Longitudinal Observational Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Observational
- Advances in Machine Learning for Wearable Sensors.ACS nano · 2024Review
- Arterial stiffness assessment using PPG feature extraction and significance testing in an in vitro cardiovascular system.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Potential of an Oral-Based Bioguard to Estimate Heart Rate Using Photoplethysmography.Biosensors · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photoplethysmography (PPG) is garnering substantial interest due to low cost, noninvasiveness, and its potential for diagnosing cardiovascular diseases, such as cardiomyopathy, heart failure, and arrhythmia. The signals obtained through PPG can yield information based on simple analyses, such as heart rate. In contrast, when accompanied by the complex analysis of sophisticated signals, valuable information, such as blood pressure, sympathetic nervous system activity, and heart rate variability, can be obtained. For a complex analysis, a better understanding of the sources of noise, which create limitations in the application of PPG, is needed to get reliable information to assess cardiovascular health. Therefore, this Special Issue handles literature about noises and how they affect the waveform of the PPG caused by individual variations (e.g., skin tone, obesity, age, and gender), physiology (e.g., respiration, venous pulsation, body site of measurement, and body temperature), and external factors (e.g., motion artifact, ambient light, and applied pressure to the skin). It also covers the issues that still need to be considered in each situation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.