ArticleBiosensors2022
An Asymmetric Microfluidic/Chitosan Device for Sustained Drug Release in Guided Bone Regeneration Applications.
Article in Biosensors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autologous guided bone regeneration: a comprehensive narrative review.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Microfluidics for Biomedical Applications.Biosensors · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
One of the major challenges of guided bone regeneration (GBR) is infections caused by pathogen colonization at wound sites. In this paper, an asymmetric microfluidic/chitosan device was developed to release drugs to inhibit infections and to ensure that guided bone regeneration can be realized. The microfluidic technique was introduced into the GBR membrane for the first time, which demonstrated more controllable drug release, more flexible clinical use and had a lower cost compared with surface treatments and embedded nanoparticles. Based on the theory of diffusion and Fick’s first law, the contact area and concentration gradient were adjusted to realize sustained drug release. The standard deviation of minocycline release over 5 days was only 12.7%, which was lower than the joint effect of porous chitosan discs and nanospheres. The in vitro experiments against E. coli and Streptococcus mutans showed the excellent antibacterial performance of the device (>95%). The in vitro experiments for fibroblasts at the microfluidic side and osteoblasts at the chitosan side showed the satisfactory biocompatibility and the ability of the device to enhance bone regeneration. Therefore, this microfluidic/chitosan device is a promising therapeutic approach to prevent infection and guide bone regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.