Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36290953›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2022

Toward

Mehran Shaghaghi, Kejia Cai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CombiningFrontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mehran ShaghaghiDepartment of Radiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0278-9936
Kejia CaiDepartment of Radiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1511-4273

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantification of proton exchange rate (kex) is a challenge in MR studies. Current techniques either have low resolutions or are dependent on the estimation of parameters that are not measurable. The Omega plot method, on the other hand, provides a direct way for determining kex independent of the agent concentration. However, it cannot be used for in vivo studies without some modification due to the contributions from the water signal. In vivo tissue proton exchange rate (kex) MRI, based on the direct saturation (DS) removed Omega plot, quantifies the weighted average of kex of the endogenous tissue metabolites. This technique has been successfully employed for imaging the variation in the kex of ex vivo phantoms, as well as in vivo human brains in healthy subjects, and stroke or multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. In this paper, we present a brief review of the methods used for kex imaging with a focus on the development of in vivo kex MRI technique based on the DS-removed Omega plot. We then review the recent clinical studies utilizing this technique for better characterizing brain lesions. We also outline technical challenges for the presented technique and discuss its prospects for detecting tissue microenvironmental changes under oxidative stress.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingProtonsBrainHumansPhantoms, ImagingWaterProtonsWatermultiple sclerosisoxidative stresspHproton exchange ratestroke

Identifiers

PMID36290953
PMCPMC9599426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.