Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36290870›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Alpha Fetoprotein, and Liver Allocation for Transplantation: Past, Present and Future.

Brianna Ruch, Josiah Wagler, Kayla Kumm, Chi Zhang, Nitin N Katariya, Mauricio Garcia-Saenz-de-Sicilia, Emmanouil Giorgakis, Amit K Mathur

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brianna RuchDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4287-4198
Josiah WaglerDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Kayla KummDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Chi ZhangDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9297-0690
Nitin N KatariyaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6706-666X
Mauricio Garcia-Saenz-de-SiciliaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0886-5175
Emmanouil GiorgakisDepartment of Surgery, Division of Solid Organ Transplant, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Medical Center, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5019-5497
Amit K MathurDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9215-2014
WinnMed · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading indications for liver transplantation and has been the treatment of choice due to the oncologic benefit for patients with advanced chronic liver disease (AdvCLD) and small tumors for the last 25 years. For HCC patients undergoing liver transplantation, alpha fetoprotein (AFP) has increasingly been applied as an independent predictor for overall survival, disease free recurrence, and waitlist drop out. In addition to static AFP, newer studies evaluating the AFP dynamic response to downstaging therapy show enhanced prognostication compared to static AFP alone. While AFP has been utilized to select HCC patients for transplant, despite years of allocation policy changes, the US allocation system continues to take a uniform approach to HCC patients, without discriminating between those with favorable or unfavorable tumor biology. We aim to review the history of liver allocation for HCC in the US, the utility of AFP in liver transplantation, the implications of weaving AFP as a biomarker into policy. Based on this review, we encourage the US transplant community to revisit its HCC organ allocation model, to incorporate more precise oncologic principles for patient selection, and to adopt AFP dynamics to better stratify waitlist dropout risk.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsLiver Transplantationalpha-FetoproteinsBiomarkersHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, Localalpha-FetoproteinsBiomarkersalpha fetoproteinhepatocellular carcinomaliver allocationliver transplantation

Identifiers

PMID36290870
PMCPMC9600271
OpenAlexW4303685470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.