Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36290672›Full record

ArticleAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Rosehip (

Petru Alexandru Vlaicu, Arabela Elena Untea, Raluca Paula Turcu, Tatiana Dumitra Panaite, Mihaela Saracila

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Petru Alexandru VlaicuFeed and Food Quality Department, National Research-Development Institute for Animal Biology and Nutrition, 077015 Balotesti, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4156-8244
Arabela Elena UnteaFeed and Food Quality Department, National Research-Development Institute for Animal Biology and Nutrition, 077015 Balotesti, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3000-5024
Raluca Paula TurcuFeed and Food Quality Department, National Research-Development Institute for Animal Biology and Nutrition, 077015 Balotesti, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-6590-0112
Tatiana Dumitra PanaiteFeed and Food Quality Department, National Research-Development Institute for Animal Biology and Nutrition, 077015 Balotesti, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4967-6602
Mihaela SaracilaFeed and Food Quality Department, National Research-Development Institute for Animal Biology and Nutrition, 077015 Balotesti, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-3878-8433
National Research Development Institute for Animal Biology and Nutrition · RO

Funding

Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalisation National Research Development Project to Finance Excellence (PFE)-8/2021Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalisation Project PN 19 09 0102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eggs are a common food of animal origin, inexpensive, and rich in bioactive substances with high biological value. Eggs enriched in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) are extremely desired by the progressive consumer. However, during storage, eggs undergo some physiochemical changes, which decrease their value. In this regard, the effect of dietary rosehip meal and flaxseed meal on hens’ egg quality characteristics, amino acids, fatty acids, health-related indices, antioxidant capacity, total polyphenols content, and shelf life was examined. For this study 120 Tetra SL laying hens, 29 weeks of age, were fed, for 4 weeks, three diets that included control (basal diet—RF0), basal diet + 1.5% rosehip and 7% flaxseed meal (RF1), and basal diet + 3% rosehip and 7% flaxseed meal (RF2). Productive performance of hens were recorded. The content of essential amino acids (EAA), antioxidant amino acids (AAA), and sulfur amino acids (SAA) was higher in RF1 and RF2, compared with RF0. Eggs belonging to the RF1 and RF2 groups had significantly (p < 0.05) higher content of n-3 PUFAs, especially linolenic and docosahexaenoic acids. Total antioxidant capacity and polyphenol content increased in both rosehip supplemented groups, but especially in RF2. Moreover, eggs from RF1 and RF2 groups maintained significantly higher egg quality parameters after storage for 14 and 28 days in the refrigerator (5 °C) and ambient temperature (21 °C), compared with those from the RF0 group. In the Haugh unit, yolk and albumen pH presented better values in RF1 and RF2 eggs compared to the RF0 eggs.

Indexed as

amino acidsantioxidantsegg qualityfatty acidslipidsproteinsrosehip mealshelf-life

Identifiers

PMID36290672
PMCPMC9598169
OpenAlexW4297973724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.