ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Predicting Analyte Concentrations from Electrochemical Aptasensor Signals Using LSTM Recurrent Networks.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Electrochemical Sensing: A Network Evidence Map of Translational Barriers and Pathways to Point-of-Care Deployment.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Psoas muscle CT radiomics-based machine learning models to predict response to infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Non-Invasive Biosensing for Healthcare Using Artificial Intelligence: A Semi-Systematic Review.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Utilizing Deep Learning Algorithms for Signal Processing in Electrochemical Biosensors: From Data Augmentation to Detection and Quantification of Chemicals of Interest.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Physiological Noise Filtering in Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Signals Using Wavelet Transform and Long-Short Term Memory Networks.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Anomaly Detection for Sensor Signals Utilizing Deep Learning Autoencoder-Based Neural Networks.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanomaterial-based aptasensors are useful devices capable of detecting small biological species. Determining suitable signal processing methods can improve the identification and quantification of target analytes detected by the biosensor and consequently improve the biosensor's performance. In this work, we propose a data augmentation method to overcome the insufficient amount of available original data and long short-term memory (LSTM) to automatically predict the analyte concentration from part of a signal registered by three electrochemical aptasensors, with differences in bioreceptors, analytes, and the signals' lengths for specific concentrations. To find the optimal network, we altered the following variables: the LSTM layer structure (unidirectional LSTM (LSTM) and bidirectional LSTM (BLSTM)), optimizers (Adam, RMSPROP, SGDM), number of hidden units, and amount of augmented data. Then, the evaluation of the networks revealed that the highest original data accuracy increased from 50% to 92% by exploiting the data augmentation method. In addition, the SGDM optimizer showed a lower performance prediction than that of the ADAM and RMSPROP algorithms, and the number of hidden units was ineffective in improving the networks' performances. Moreover, the BLSTM nets showed more accurate predictions than those of the ULSTM nets on lengthier signals. These results demonstrate that this method can automatically detect the analyte concentration from the sensor signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.