Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36290469›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Encoder-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulator for Bilateral Wrist Activities-Design and Evaluation.

Cassandra D Solomons, Vivekanandan Shanmugasundaram, Sivakumar Balasubramanian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cassandra D SolomonsDepartment of Instrumentation and Control, School of Electrical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vivekanandan ShanmugasundaramDepartment of Instrumentation and Control, School of Electrical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sivakumar BalasubramanianDepartment of Bioengineering, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Bagayam, Vellore 632002, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5915-1346
Vellore Institute of Technology University · INChristian Medical College, Vellore · IN

Funding

Department of Science & Technology SR/WOS-A/ET-69/2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper limb impairment following stroke is often characterized by limited voluntary control in the affected arm. In addition, significant motor coordination problems occur on the unaffected arm due to avoidance of performing bilateral symmetrical activities. Rehabilitation strategies should, therefore, not only aim at improving voluntary control on the affected arm, but also contribute to synchronizing activity from both upper limbs. The encoder-controlled functional electrical stimulator, described in this paper, implements precise contralateral control of wrist flexion and extension with electrical stimulation. The stimulator is calibrated for each individual to obtain a table of stimulation parameters versus wrist angle. This table is used to set stimulation parameters dynamically, based on the difference in wrist angle between the set and stimulated side, which is continuously monitored. This allows the wrist on the stimulated side to follow flexion and extension patterns on the set side, thereby mirroring wrist movements of the normal side. This device also gives real-time graphical feedback on how the stimulated wrist is performing in comparison to the normal side. A study was performed on 25 normal volunteers to determine how closely wrist movements on the set side were being followed on the stimulated side. Graphical results show that there were minor differences, which were quantified by considering the peak angles of flexion and extension on the set and stimulated side for each participant. The mean difference in peak flexion and extension range of movement was 2.3 degrees and 1.9 degrees, respectively, with a mean time lag of 1 s between the set and the stimulated angle graphs.

Indexed as

angle controlled stimulationbilateral wrist trainingbrain plasticity (Min.5-Max.8)functional electrical stimulationstroke rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID36290469
PMCPMC9598413
OpenAlexW4297152873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.