Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36290357›Full record

ReviewBiology2022

Carbon Footprint Management by Agricultural Practices.

Ekrem Ozlu, Francisco Javier Arriaga, Serdar Bilen, Gafur Gozukara, Emre Babur

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Advances in Dairy Cattle Reproduction-A Foreword.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ekrem OzluVernon G. James Research Center-Tidewater Research Station, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, 207 Research Station, Plymouth, NC 27962, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1225-3243
Francisco Javier ArriagaDepartment of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
Serdar BilenDepartment of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25100, Turkey.
Gafur GozukaraDepartment of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
Emre BaburDepartment of Soil Science and Ecology, Faculty of Forestry, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş 46050, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1776-3018

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global attention to climate change issues, especially air temperature changes, has drastically increased over the last half-century. Along with population growth, greater surface temperature, and higher greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, there are growing concerns for ecosystem sustainability and other human existence on earth. The contribution of agriculture to GHG emissions indicates a level of 18% of total GHGs, mainly from carbon dioxide (CO

Indexed as

agriculturecarbon footprintcarbon sequestrationgreenhouse gas emissionssoil management

Identifiers

PMID36290357
PMCPMC9598751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.