Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36290294›Full record

ArticleBiology2022

Evaluation of the Antifungal Activity of

Shereen A Soliman, Mona M Khaleil, Rabab A Metwally

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Whole-genome sequencing and characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Biocontrol Potential ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  11. Metabolomic profiling ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Efficacy of Seed-Biopriming withPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Shereen A SolimanBotany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-6104-6107
Mona M KhaleilBotany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.
Rabab A MetwallyBotany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.
Zagazig University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endophytic bacteria are plant-beneficial bacteria with a broad host range. They provide numerous benefits to their hosts, helping them tolerate several biotic and abiotic stresses. An interest has recently been developed in endophytic bacteria which are producing bioactive compounds that contribute to the biological control of various phytopathogens. This research paper aimed to investigate the potentiality of new local strains of endophytic bacteria such as

Indexed as

antifungal activityBacillus amyloliquefaciensendophytic bacteriaplant pathogenic fungisecondary metabolites

Identifiers

PMID36290294
PMCPMC9599029
OpenAlexW4297147938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.