Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36290215›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

A Comparison of Fresh and Frozen Lamb Meat-Differences in Technological Meat Quality and Sensory Attributes.

Elin Stenberg, Katarina Arvidsson-Segerkvist, Anders H Karlsson, Aðalheiður Ólafsdóttir, Óli Þór Hilmarsson, María Gudjónsdóttir, Guðjón Thorkelsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elin StenbergDepartment of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 234, 53223 Skara, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6697-2978
Katarina Arvidsson-SegerkvistDepartment of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 234, 53223 Skara, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0795-9914
Anders H KarlssonDepartment of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 234, 53223 Skara, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3466-4502
Aðalheiður ÓlafsdóttirMatís Ohf, Vínlandsleið 12, 113 Reykjavík, Iceland.
Óli Þór HilmarssonMatís Ohf, Vínlandsleið 12, 113 Reykjavík, Iceland.
María GudjónsdóttirMatís Ohf, Vínlandsleið 12, 113 Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0001-7577-1190
Guðjón ThorkelssonMatís Ohf, Vínlandsleið 12, 113 Reykjavík, Iceland.

Funding

Agricultural Productivity Fund of IcelandNordic Native MeatSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technological meat quality and sensory attributes of fresh and frozen lamb meat were compared. Samples were collected from two abattoirs (one small-scale, one large-scale) that use different slaughter methods in terms of chilling regime and electrical stimulation. The fresh and frozen meat samples included products from both slaughter systems. Ten twin pairs of ram lambs were used in the study, with one of each twin slaughtered at each abattoir. Fresh meat was analysed after chilling and frozen meat was stored frozen for three months and analysed after thawing. The

Indexed as

cooking lossflavourLF-NMRmeat colourodourtendernesstextureWarner-Bratzler shear forcewater and lipid distribution

Identifiers

PMID36290215
PMCPMC9597754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.