Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36290152›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Poor Welfare Indicators and Husbandry Practices at Lion (

Saryn Chorney, Alyssa DeFalco, Jennifer Jacquet, Claire LaFrance, Melanie Lary, Hildegard Pirker, Becca Franks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saryn ChorneyDepartment of Environmental Studies, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Alyssa DeFalcoDepartment of Environmental Studies, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Jennifer JacquetDepartment of Environmental Studies, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Claire LaFranceFOUR PAWS International, Head of Communications, Research and Campaigns Officer, Four Paws International, 36 Bromfield St, #410, Boston, MA 02108, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0389-5933
Melanie LaryFOUR PAWS International, Head of Communications, Research and Campaigns Officer, Four Paws International, 36 Bromfield St, #410, Boston, MA 02108, USA.
Hildegard PirkerLIONSROCK, Head of Animal Welfare Department, Sustainable Sanctuaries, LIONSROCK Big Cat Sanctuary, P.O. Box 1416, Bethlehem 9700, South Africa.
Becca FranksDepartment of Environmental Studies, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7558-6718

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing concern about captive lion hunting and breeding operations in South Africa, including cub-petting tourism. For the first time, we assess the quality of cub-petting facilities and code the stress behaviors of lion cubs when handled by tourists by analyzing four stress-related behaviors and six indicators of poor husbandry in 49 YouTube videos of tourist−lion cub interactions (from at least 11 South African safari parks, 2008-2019). We also categorized videos as regular tourism vs. voluntourism (tourism under the guise of helping those in need). We found a median of four poor husbandry practices per video, with all but two videos involving very young cubs (under 7 months) and the majority (61%) involving cubs estimated under 3 months old. Two videos claimed to show cubs as young as 9 days old and 1 day old, with their eyes still closed. The lion mother was apparent in only 1 of 49 videos. All but one of the interactions took place during the day, although young cubs are primarily active at night. The majority of videos (77%) showed cubs engaging in at least one stress behavior, and the most common stress behaviors were avoidance and aggression. Comparing voluntourism to regular tourism, we found no difference in instances of poor husbandry or observable stress behaviors (p’s > 0.6). These results show that cub-petting operations are characterized by poor cub welfare, including features that are inherently harmful to cub development (e.g., separation from the mother at an early age and forced activity outside normal waking hours). Existing research suggests that many tourists are likely unaware of these negative impacts and may even believe that they are helping the cubs. This analysis provides evidence to the contrary.

Indexed as

animal welfarecompassionate conservationcontent analysishuman–animal interactionslion protectionsocial mediaspecies-specific behaviorwildlife exploitationwildlife tourism

Identifiers

PMID36290152
PMCPMC9597823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.