Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36290142›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Identifying Key Factors for Accelerating the Transition to Animal-Testing-Free Medical Science through Co-Creative, Interdisciplinary Learning between Students and Teachers.

Fatima Zohra Abarkan, Anna M A Wijen, Rebecca M G van Eijden, Fréderique Struijs, Phoebe Dennis, Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga, Ingrid Visseren-Hamakers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fatima Zohra AbarkanFaculty of Science, Radboud University, Radboud Honours Academy, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1841-2308
Anna M A WijenFaculty of Medical Science, Radboud University, Radboud Honours Academy, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rebecca M G van EijdenInstitute for Management Research, Radboud University, Radboud Honours Academy, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Fréderique StruijsFaculty of Science, Radboud University, Radboud Honours Academy, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9940-0327
Phoebe DennisInstitute for Management Research, Radboud University, Radboud Honours Academy, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2048-8424
Merel Ritskes-HoitingaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5315-284X
Ingrid Visseren-HamakersInstitute for Management Research, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even with the introduction of the replacement, reduction, refinement (the three Rs) approach and promising technological developments in animal-testing-free alternatives over the past two decades, a significant number of animal tests are still performed in medical science today. This article analyses which factors could accelerate the transition to animal-free medical science, applying the multi-level perspective (MLP) framework. The analysis was based on qualitative research, including a desk study (literature review and document analysis), lectures from experts, and nine online focus group sessions with experts on 26 July 2021. These were undertaken as part of an honours project between May and September 2021 to identify barriers, levers, and opportunities for accelerating this transition. The MLP framework identifies required changes at three levels: innovations and new practices (niche level), the current (bio)medical research system (regime level), and larger societal forces (landscape level). All three levels interact in a non-linear fashion. The model enabled us to identify many relevant factors influencing the transition to animal-testing-free medical science and enabled priority setting. Our findings supported the formulation of six "focus areas" to which stakeholders could devote efforts in order to accelerate the transition to animal-testing-free medical science: (1) thorough and translatable new approach methods (NAMs) for human-relevant medical research; (2) open science and sharing data; (3) targeted funding for NAMs; (4) implementing and modernising legislation for NAMs; (5) interdisciplinary education on animal-testing-free medical science; and (6) facilitating a shift in societal views, as this would be of benefit to both animals and humans. It is proposed that these focus areas should be implemented in parallel.

Indexed as

animal ethicsanimal-free innovationsanimal researchmedical researchNAMnew approach methodstransition analysistranslation science

Identifiers

PMID36290142
PMCPMC9597726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.