Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36290098›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Combination Regimens with Colistin Sulfate versus Colistin Sulfate Monotherapy in the Treatment of Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli.

Min Hao, Yang Yang, Yan Guo, Shi Wu, Fupin Hu, Xiaohua Qin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Clinical efficacy and risk factors of colistin sulfate in the treatment of carbapenemZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Min HaoInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Yang YangInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Yan GuoInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Shi WuInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Fupin HuInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Xiaohua QinInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7340-1484
Fudan University · CN

Funding

China International Medical Foundation Z-2018-35-2003National Natural Science Foundation of China 82102404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) have become a global concern because of the limited antibiotic treatment options for CRO infections. Colistin sulfate is a type of polymyxin approved for the treatment of CRO in China. To date, studies on polymyxin have mainly focused on in vitro antibacterial activity or pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and few have evaluated its clinical efficacy. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of colistin sulfate monotherapy and its combination with other antimicrobials in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) infections in adults. This retrospective study included adult patients with CR-GNB infections treated with colistin sulfate by intravenous drip between January and June 2020. The patients were divided into two groups, according to the administration of colistin sulfate alone or in combination with other antibiotics. Group-wise demographic data, comorbidities, clinical efficacy, prognosis, and adverse events were analyzed and compared. In total, 26 patients in the colistin sulfate monotherapy group and 54 patients in the combined therapy group were recruited. The clinical efficacy in the combined therapy group (94.4%) was significantly higher than that in the colistin monotherapy group (73.1%) (

Indexed as

carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilliclinical efficacycolistin sulfatecombined therapysafety evaluation

Identifiers

PMID36290098
PMCPMC9598655
OpenAlexW4306836463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.