Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36290058›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Three Distinct Annotation Platforms Differ in Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Long-Read, Short-Read, and Hybrid Sequences Derived from Total Genomic DNA or from Purified Plasmid DNA.

Grazieli Maboni, Rodrigo de Paula Baptista, Joy Wireman, Isaac Framst, Anne O Summers, Susan Sanchez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Profiles inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Grazieli MaboniAthens Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Rodrigo de Paula BaptistaInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1806-8260
Joy WiremanDepartment of Microbiology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7696-2909
Isaac FramstDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8684-6135
Anne O SummersDepartment of Microbiology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Susan SanchezAthens Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2438-5983
University of Georgia · USHouston Methodist · USUniversity of Guelph · CA

Funding

One Health; Epidemiology of natural and deliberate contaminants (infectious and tU18FD004623 · FDA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI SALIKI, JEREMIAH T, SANCHEZ, SUSAN · 2012 to 2016
$97k
FDA HHS U18 FD004623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances and lower costs in rapid high-throughput sequencing have engendered hope that whole genome sequencing (WGS) might afford complete resistome characterization in bacterial isolates. WGS is particularly useful for the clinical characterization of fastidious and slow-growing bacteria. Despite its potential, several challenges should be addressed before adopting WGS to detect antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes in the clinical laboratory. Here, with three distinct ESKAPE bacteria (

Indexed as

AMR predictionIllumina sequencingNanopore sequencingplasmidsWGS workflowswhole genomes

Identifiers

PMID36290058
PMCPMC9598756
OpenAlexW4304759114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.