Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36290028›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Towards a Better Use of Antimicrobials on Farms: Insights from a Participatory Approach in the French Pig and Poultry Sectors.

Christian Ducrot, Marie-Jeanne Guénin, Anne Hemonic, Nathalie Rousset, Yannick Carre, Charles Facon, Philippe Le Coz, Jocelyn Marguerie, Jean-Marc Petiot, Maxime Jarnoux and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Christian DucrotASTRE, Université de Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, 34398 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1418-7446
Marie-Jeanne GuéninASTRE, Université de Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, 34398 Montpellier, France.
Anne HemonicIFIP-Institut Du Porc, La Motte au Vicomte, 35651 Le Rheu, France.
Nathalie RoussetITAVI, Antenne Ouest, 22440 Ploufragan, France.
Yannick CarreANVOL, Interprofession Volaille de Chair, 175 Rue Jean Monnet, 29490 Guipavas, France.
Charles FaconSNVECO, Syndicat National des Vétérinaires COnseils, 23, Rue Olivier de Serres, 85500 Les Herbiers, France.
Philippe Le CozSociété Nationale des Groupements Techniques Vétérinaires, 75011 Paris, France.
Jocelyn MarguerieSociété Nationale des Groupements Techniques Vétérinaires, 75011 Paris, France.
Jean-Marc PetiotConseil National de l'Ordre des Vétérinaires, 34 Rue Bréguet, 75011 Paris, France.
Maxime JarnouxDGAL, Direction Générale de L'alimentation, 251 Rue de Vaugirard, 75015 Paris, France.
Mily Leblanc-MaridorBIOEPAR, INRAE, Oniris, 44300 Nantes, France.
Mathilde PaulIHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31076 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2940-8547
Sophie MoliaASTRE, Université de Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, 34398 Montpellier, France.
Catherine BellocBIOEPAR, INRAE, Oniris, 44300 Nantes, France.
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse · FRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRDirection Générale de l'Armement · FRInstitut du Porc · FRInstitut Technique de l'Aviculture · FRUniversité Jean Monnet · FR

Funding

European Union 817626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the strong decrease in antimicrobial use in the French poultry and pig sectors over the last decade, room for improvement remains. A participatory approach was set up in France, involving representatives of veterinarians, the pig and poultry industries, technical institutes, the French Ministry of Agriculture, and researchers, to further improve how antimicrobials are used on farms. By successively defining a shared, long-term vision of future antimicrobial use on farms, identifying lock-in mechanisms impeding this future vision from being realized, and articulating practical questions on how to move in the desired direction, the group rapidly reached a consensus. The results highlight the need for consensual standardized monitoring tools that would allow farmers and veterinarians to jointly monitor the health, welfare, antimicrobial resistance, and antimicrobial use on farms. Other results relate to better communication and training for citizens regarding animal health, animal welfare, and proper antimicrobial use; some benefits but also counterproductive effects of antibiotic-free labels that imperil animal health and welfare; the economic competitiveness of farms on international markets; and the economic sustainability of farm animal veterinary practices. These results call for a concerted way to produce tools for farmers and veterinarians and the broader involvement of other food sector actors.

Indexed as

antibiotic-free meatantimicrobial usedrug managinghealthmonitoring toolsparticipatory approachpigpoultrywelfare

Identifiers

PMID36290028
PMCPMC9598240
OpenAlexW4303579254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.