Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36290001›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Current Practices and Opportunities for Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy in Hospitals: A National Cross-Sectional Survey.

Hester H Stoorvogel, Marlies E J L Hulscher, Heiman F L Wertheim, Ed P F Yzerman, Maarten Scholing, Jeroen A Schouten, Jaap Ten Oever

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hester H StoorvogelRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine & IQ Healthcare, Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, 6500HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5385-6764
Marlies E J L HulscherRadboud University Medical Center, Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, 6500HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2160-4810
Heiman F L WertheimRadboud University Medical Center, Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, 6500HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ed P F YzermanABR Zorgnetwerk Noord-Holland-Flevoland, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten ScholingABR Zorgnetwerk Noord-Holland-Flevoland, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4891-5149
Jeroen A SchoutenRadboud University Medical Center, Department of Intensive Care & IQ Healthcare, Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, 6500HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jaap Ten OeverRadboud University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, 6500HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLOLVG · NL

Funding

Gelderland Care Network for Infection Prevention (GAIN)Pfizer (Netherlands)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This nationwide study assessed how outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is organised by Dutch acute care hospitals, the barriers experienced, and how an OPAT program affects the way hospitals organised OPAT care. We systematically developed and administered a survey to all 71 Dutch acute care hospitals between November 2021 and February 2022. Analyses were primarily descriptive and included a comparison between hospitals with and without an OPAT program. Sixty of the 71 hospitals (84.5%) responded. Fifty-five (91.7%) performed OPAT, with a median number of 20.8 (interquartile range [IQR] 10.3-29.7) patients per 100 hospital beds per year. Of these 55 hospitals, 31 (56.4%) had selection criteria for OPAT and 34 (61.8%) had a protocol for laboratory follow-up. Sixteen hospitals (29.1%) offered self-administered OPAT (S-OPAT), with a median percentage of 5.0% of patients (IQR: 2.3%-10.0%) actually performing self-administration. Twenty-five hospitals (45.5%) had an OPAT-related outcome registration. The presence of an OPAT program (22 hospitals, 40.0%) was significantly associated with aspects of well-organised OPAT care. The most commonly experienced barriers to OPAT implementation were a lack of financial, administrative, and IT support and insufficient time of healthcare staff. Concluding, hospital-initiated OPAT is widely available in the Netherlands, but various aspects of well-organised OPAT care can be improved. Implementation of a team-based OPAT program can contribute to such improvements. The observed variation provides leads for further scientific research, guidelines, and practical implementation programs.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial stewardshiphome infusion therapyoutpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT)survey

Identifiers

PMID36290001
PMCPMC9598700
OpenAlexW4303579236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.