Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36289949›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Comparison between Ceftriaxone and Sulbactam-Ampicillin as Initial Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hideo Kato, Mao Hagihara, Nobuhiro Asai, Jun Hirai, Yuka Yamagishi, Takuya Iwamoto, Hiroshige Mikamo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Management of pneumonia by the emergency radiologist.European journal of radiology open · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antibiotic therapy for bacterial pneumonia.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hideo KatoDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5272-9560
Mao HagiharaDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan.
Nobuhiro AsaiDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan.
Jun HiraiDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9184-7175
Yuka YamagishiDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan.
Takuya IwamotoDepartment of Pharmacy, Mie University Hospital, Tsu 514-8507, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6445-4410
Hiroshige MikamoDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan.
Aichi Medical University · JPMie University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current guidelines recommend the use of ceftriaxone and sulbactam-ampicillin for the initial treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, there are no clear data on these guidelines. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ceftriaxone and sulbactam-ampicillin in the initial treatment of CAP. The Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Ichushi, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases were systematically searched from inception to July 2022. The studies included patients who received ceftriaxone or sulbactam-ampicillin as the initial antibiotic therapy for CAP. The mortality and clinical cure rates were evaluated. Of the 2152 citations identified for screening, four studies were included. Results of the pooled analysis indicated no significant differences in the mortality and clinical cure rates between patients treated with ceftriaxone and those treated with sulbactam-ampicillin (mortality, odds ratio [OR]: 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-5.96; clinical cure rate, OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.18-6.44). This study supports the guidelines for CAP treatment, though further studies are needed to obtain a deeper understanding.

Indexed as

ceftriaxonecommunity-acquired pneumoniameta-analysissulbactam-ampicillin

Identifiers

PMID36289949
PMCPMC9598877
OpenAlexW4296620523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.