Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36289867›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2022

Implantable Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review of Prospective Studies.

Steven Char, Max Y Jin, Vinicius Tieppo Francio, Nasir Hussain, Eric J Wang, Mahmoud Morsi, Vwaire Orhurhu, Larry J Prokop, Adam Fink, Ryan S D'Souza

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Steven CharDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Max Y JinDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Vinicius Tieppo FrancioDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6513-0058
Nasir HussainDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Eric J WangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9381-9554
Mahmoud MorsiDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Management, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9140-7134
Vwaire OrhurhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Susquehanna, Williamsport, PA 17701, USA.
Larry J ProkopMayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.
Adam Fink1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 110 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Ryan S D'SouzaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4601-9837
Charles University · CZJohn H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County · USJohns Hopkins University · USMayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic Hospital · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USWilliams (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has been utilized for over 50 years with accumulating evidence of efficacy in a variety of chronic pain conditions. The level and strength of evidence supporting the use of PNS for peripheral neuropathic pain remains unclear. The purpose of this review is to synthesize data from prospective studies on the efficacy of PNS for neuropathic pain as it pertains to pain intensity, neurological deficits/neuropathy (e.g., weakness, sensory deficits, gait/balance), and other secondary outcomes (quality of life, satisfaction, emotional functioning, and adverse events). In compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this review identified articles from MEDLINE(R), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. Overall, per the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria, pooled results demonstrate very low quality or low quality of evidence supporting modest to substantial improvement in pain and neurological function after PNS implantation for treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain. PNS for phantom limb pain was the only indication that had moderate level evidence. Future prospective and well-powered studies are warranted to assess the efficacy of PNS for peripheral neuropathic pain.

Indexed as

chronic painneuromodulationperipheral nerve stimulatorperipheral neuropathy

Identifiers

PMID36289867
PMCPMC9599770
OpenAlexW4306652540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.