Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36289845›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2022

Does a High-Risk (>1/50) Result for First-Trimester Combined Screening Always Entail Invasive Testing? Which Patients from This Group Might Benefit from cfDNA Testing?

Rocío García-Jiménez, Irene Valero, Isabel Corrales-Gutiérrez, Reyes Granell, Carlota Borrero, José Antonio Sainz-Bueno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rocío García-JiménezObstetrics and Gynecology Department, Juan Ramon Jiménez Hospital, 21005 Huelva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0409-8933
Irene ValeroObstetrics and Gynecology Department, Juan Ramon Jiménez Hospital, 21005 Huelva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1983-2475
Isabel Corrales-GutiérrezObstetrics and Gynecology Department, Virgen Macarena Hospital University, 41009 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6317-2668
Reyes GranellObstetrics and Gynecology Department, Juan Ramon Jiménez Hospital, 21005 Huelva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7553-1688
Carlota BorreroObstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.
José Antonio Sainz-BuenoObstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9571-3219
Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez · ESHospital Universitario de Valme · ESHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is offered as part of a contingent screening for patients with a first-trimester combined test (FCT) risk between 1/50 and 1/250. However, most aneuploidies are within the group of patients with a risk above 1/10. An observational, retrospective, and multi-centric study was carried out, to evaluate the theorical performance of lowering the cut-off point for the high-risk group from 1/50 to 1/10. Out of the 25,920 patients included, 25,374 (97.9%) consented to the cfDNA contingent screening for aneuploidies. With the proposed strategy, knowing that the detection rate (DR) of cfDNA testing for trisomy 21 is 99.7%, the DR for trisomy 21 would have stayed in a 93.2%, just as it was with the current strategy. In this instance, 267 (1.1%) invasive tests would have been performed, while the current strategy had a total of 307 (1.2%). The false positive rate (FPR) rate would have stayed at 5.2% in both scenarios. In conclusion, the contingent screening of aneuploidies based in the result of the FCT, offering the analysis of cfDNA to patients with an intermediate risk after lowering the cut-off point from 1/50 to 1/10, is a valid alternative that might maintain the current detection rates and avoid the complications associated with invasive testing.

Indexed as

aneuploidycell-free DNAcontingent screeningfirst-trimester combined testingnon-invasive prenatal testingtrisomy 13trisomy 18trisomy 21

Identifiers

PMID36289845
PMCPMC9599393
OpenAlexW4306362110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.