Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36289825›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2022

Integrated Neuroregenerative Techniques for Plasticity of the Injured Spinal Cord.

Erik Leemhuis, Francesca Favieri, Giuseppe Forte, Mariella Pazzaglia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erik LeemhuisDipartimento di Psicologia, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1430-4502
Francesca FavieriDipartimento di Psicologia, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6696-5855
Giuseppe ForteBody and Action Lab, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, 00179 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5223-041X
Mariella PazzagliaDipartimento di Psicologia, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9196-7078
Fondazione Santa Lucia · IT

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health RF-2018-12365682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On the slow path to improving the life expectancy and quality of life of patients post spinal cord injury (SCI), recovery remains controversial. The potential role of the regenerative capacity of the nervous system has led to numerous attempts to stimulate the SCI to re-establish the interrupted sensorimotor loop and to understand its potential in the recovery process. Numerous resources are now available, from pharmacological to biomolecular approaches and from neuromodulation to sensorimotor rehabilitation interventions based on the use of various neural interfaces, exoskeletons, and virtual reality applications. The integration of existing resources seems to be a promising field of research, especially from the perspective of improving living conditions in the short to medium term. Goals such as reducing chronic forms of neuropathic pain, regaining control over certain physiological activities, and enhancing residual abilities are often more urgent than complete functional recovery. In this perspective article, we provide an overview of the latest interventions for the treatment of SCI through broad phases of injury rehabilitation. The underlying intention of this work is to introduce a spinal cord neuroplasticity-based multimodal approach to promote functional recovery and improve quality of life after SCI. Nonetheless, when used separately, biomolecular therapeutic approaches have been shown to have modest outcomes.

Indexed as

hydrogelnanomaterialsneuroplasticityneuroregenerationregenerative medicinespinal cord injuryspinal cord stimulationstem cell therapy

Identifiers

PMID36289825
PMCPMC9599452
OpenAlexW4306149411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.