ArticleBiomedicines2022
Early Effects of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Combined Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma in Poland: A Multicenter Experience.
Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immune-Related Adverse Events of Cemiplimab Therapy in Advanced Cervical Cancer-Data from the Polish-Czech Cervical Cancer Immunotherapy Group (PCCIG-01) with a Review of the Literature.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Real-world efficacy and toxicity of ipilimumab and nivolumab as a first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma according to IMDC risk criteria-A multi-center retrospective analysis on behalf of the GUARDIANS group.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- A retrospective chart review of UK patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Article
- Real-world efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a Polish multicenter study.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Observational
- Effectiveness and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab in older adults with renal cell carcinoma: findings from a multicenter observational study in Poland.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Exploring the efficacy of nivolumab and ipilimumab in renal cell carcinoma: insights from a district hospital cohort study.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025Article
- Thyroid disorders as predictors of cemiplimab efficacy in recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer: real-world evidence from Poland.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Observational
- Real-world outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy in later lines of recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer - evidence from a rescue access program in Poland.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2025Article
- Adverse events after nivolumab and ipilimumab combined immunotherapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a multicentre experience in Poland.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Related Rheumatological Complications: Cooperation between Rheumatologists and Oncologists.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Nivolumab and ipilimumab combination became the first-line standard in advanced melanoma. We assessed its efficacy in a real-life study in Poland. In a one-year follow-up, we evaluated the medical records of 50 melanoma patients treated with that modality in five oncology centers. We recorded therapy outcomes and adverse events (AEs) after 3 and 12 months of therapy. At the first checkpoint, the disease control rate (DCR) was recorded in 58% (n = 29) of patients, but the same number of patients (n = 29, 58%) stopped immunotherapy due to disease progression (PD, n = 14, 48.3%), toxicity (n = 11, 37.9%) or death (n = 4, 13.8%). Among patients with DCR after the induction phase, 8 (27.6%) terminated due to toxicity, and 21 (72.4%) continued. However, at the 12-month checkpoint, only 14 patients (27% of all) were still receiving immunotherapy. In 7 (33.3%) it was discontinued due to PD (n = 2), toxicity (n = 2, 28.6% each), or death (n = 3, 42.9%). AEs occurred in 66.7% (n = 34) of patients; severe (grade 3 or 4) in half of them. Interestingly, those with AEs had an 80% lower risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07−0.57, p = 0.001) and PD (HR 0.2, 95%CI 0.09−0.47, p < 0.0001). In the entire group of patients, after a 12-month follow-up, the median overall survival was not reached (NR, range: 6.8 months-NR) and progression-free survival was 6.3 (range: 3-NR) months. Our results demonstrate that combined immunotherapy is less effective in real-life than in pivotal trials. However, early responders will likely continue the therapy after a one-year follow-up. AEs occurrence might be a predictor of clinical effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.