Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36289781›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2022

Biophysical Stimulation in Delayed Fracture Healing of Hand Phalanx: A Radiographic Evaluation.

Francesco De Francesco, Pasquale Gravina, Stefano Varagona, Stefania Setti, Antonio Gigante, Michele Riccio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Treatment of Closed Finger and Metacarpal Fractures.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco De FrancescoDepartment of Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche, Via Conca, 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2977-7828
Pasquale GravinaDepartment of Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche, Via Conca, 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Stefano VaragonaClinical Orthopedics, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Conca, 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6460-4370
Stefania SettiIGEA SpA, Clinical Biophysics, Via Parmenide, 10/A, 41012 Carpi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8990-5452
Antonio GiganteClinical Orthopedics, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Conca, 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Michele RiccioDepartment of Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche, Via Conca, 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Marche Polytechnic University · ITIGEA Clinical Biophysics (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phalangeal fractures are common events among the upper limbs accounting for 10% of all human body fractures. Fracture complete healing process may persevere several months or years. Most phalangeal fractures present favorable union within 3 to 6 weeks. In the literature, biophysical stimulation has yielded favorable outcomes in the treatment of hand fractures. A survey involving hospitals in the US reported the use of biophysical stimulation (72%) in relation to nonhealing fractures at three months after trauma. A noninvasive procedure such as biophysical stimulation may be preferential prior to consideration of invasive procedures. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 80 phalangeal fractures, 43 of which did not show any radiographic sign of healing 30 days after surgery; on radiograms, we calculated radiographic data and the total active motion (TAM) for clinical comparison. All radiographic images were evaluated using Adobe Photoshop CS3 (version 10.0, Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). We calculated the index of relative bone healing each month after surgery starting from 30 days, which was considered as T1, and followed up for a total of 6 months after stimulation (T6) with better results in stimulated groups. We concluded that prompt administration of biophysical stimulation supports fracture healing and yields an important improvement in the union rate compared with nontreatment. Above all, our patients experienced less injury-related distress between the fracture and repair period, which consequently reduced immobilization time, envisaging an early rehabilitation interval, with a better patient hand outcome.

Indexed as

biophysical stimulationCCEFdelayed fractureelectromagnetic fieldnon-unionPEMFphalangeal fracture

Identifiers

PMID36289781
PMCPMC9599654
OpenAlexW4303946618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.