Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36289709›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2022

Imaging Technologies for Cerebral Pharmacokinetic Studies: Progress and Perspectives.

Weikang Ban, Yuyang You, Zhihong Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reinventing amlodipine.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  2. PET imaging of alpha-synuclein: from radiotracer design through in vitro and in vivo translation.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Spatial metabolic analysis of the regulatory effects of DL-3-n-butylphthalide in a cerebral ischemia-reperfusion mouse model.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Weikang BanInstitute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100193, China.
Yuyang YouBeijing Institute of Technology, School of Automation, Beijing 100081, China.
Zhihong YangInstitute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100193, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNBeijing Institute of Technology · CN

Funding

the Beijing Natural Science Foundation of China 7173267the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81473579the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81973744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic assessment of drug disposition processes in vivo is critical in predicting pharmacodynamics and toxicology to reduce the risk of inappropriate drug development. The blood-brain barrier (BBB), a special physiological structure in brain tissue, hinders the entry of targeted drugs into the central nervous system (CNS), making the drug concentrations in target tissue correlate poorly with the blood drug concentrations. Additionally, once non-CNS drugs act directly on the fragile and important brain tissue, they may produce extra-therapeutic effects that may impair CNS function. Thus, an intracerebral pharmacokinetic study was developed to reflect the disposition and course of action of drugs following intracerebral absorption. Through an increasing understanding of the fine structure in the brain and the rapid development of analytical techniques, cerebral pharmacokinetic techniques have developed into non-invasive imaging techniques. Through non-invasive imaging techniques, molecules can be tracked and visualized in the entire BBB, visualizing how they enter the BBB, allowing quantitative tools to be combined with the imaging system to derive reliable pharmacokinetic profiles. The advent of imaging-based pharmacokinetic techniques in the brain has made the field of intracerebral pharmacokinetics more complete and reliable, paving the way for elucidating the dynamics of drug action in the brain and predicting its course. The paper reviews the development and application of imaging technologies for cerebral pharmacokinetic study, represented by optical imaging, radiographic autoradiography, radionuclide imaging and mass spectrometry imaging, and objectively evaluates the advantages and limitations of these methods for predicting the pharmacodynamic and toxic effects of drugs in brain tissues.

Indexed as

cerebral pharmacokineticsimaging technologiesmass spectrometry imagingoptical imagingradiographic autoradiographyradionuclide imaging

Identifiers

PMID36289709
PMCPMC9598571
OpenAlexW4303613768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.