ReviewBiomedicines2022
Imaging Technologies for Cerebral Pharmacokinetic Studies: Progress and Perspectives.
Review in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reinventing amlodipine.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2026Review
- PET imaging of alpha-synuclein: from radiotracer design through in vitro and in vivo translation.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Review
- Biopharmaceutical analysis - current analytical challenges, limitations, and perspectives.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Article
- Spatial metabolic analysis of the regulatory effects of DL-3-n-butylphthalide in a cerebral ischemia-reperfusion mouse model.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Article
- Engineered Antibodies to Improve Efficacy against Neurodegenerative Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Transcytosis-Driven Treatment of Neurodegenerative Disorders by mRNA-Expressed Antibody-Transferrin Conjugates.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Mass spectrometry in ocular drug research.Mass spectrometry reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pharmacokinetic assessment of drug disposition processes in vivo is critical in predicting pharmacodynamics and toxicology to reduce the risk of inappropriate drug development. The blood-brain barrier (BBB), a special physiological structure in brain tissue, hinders the entry of targeted drugs into the central nervous system (CNS), making the drug concentrations in target tissue correlate poorly with the blood drug concentrations. Additionally, once non-CNS drugs act directly on the fragile and important brain tissue, they may produce extra-therapeutic effects that may impair CNS function. Thus, an intracerebral pharmacokinetic study was developed to reflect the disposition and course of action of drugs following intracerebral absorption. Through an increasing understanding of the fine structure in the brain and the rapid development of analytical techniques, cerebral pharmacokinetic techniques have developed into non-invasive imaging techniques. Through non-invasive imaging techniques, molecules can be tracked and visualized in the entire BBB, visualizing how they enter the BBB, allowing quantitative tools to be combined with the imaging system to derive reliable pharmacokinetic profiles. The advent of imaging-based pharmacokinetic techniques in the brain has made the field of intracerebral pharmacokinetics more complete and reliable, paving the way for elucidating the dynamics of drug action in the brain and predicting its course. The paper reviews the development and application of imaging technologies for cerebral pharmacokinetic study, represented by optical imaging, radiographic autoradiography, radionuclide imaging and mass spectrometry imaging, and objectively evaluates the advantages and limitations of these methods for predicting the pharmacodynamic and toxic effects of drugs in brain tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.