Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36289610›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2022

Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Children: State of the Art.

Annamaria Venanzi, Paola Di Filippo, Chiara Santagata, Sabrina Di Pillo, Francesco Chiarelli, Marina Attanasi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annamaria VenanziDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Paola Di FilippoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7336-4292
Chiara SantagataDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Sabrina Di PilloDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Francesco ChiarelliDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Marina AttanasiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is a non-invasive ventilatory support that has gained interest over the last ten years as a valid alternative to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in children with respiratory failure. Its safety, availability, tolerability, and easy management have resulted its increasing usage, even outside intensive care units. Despite its wide use in daily clinical practice, there is still a lack of guidelines to standardize the use of HFNC. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge about the mechanisms of action, safety, clinical effects, and tolerance of HFNC in children, and to propose a clinical practices algorithm for children with respiratory failure.

Indexed as

bronchiolitischildrenheated humidified high-flowoxygen therapyrespiratory failure

Identifiers

PMID36289610
PMCPMC9598483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.