Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36289532›Full record

Trial reportJournal of hematology & oncology2022

Efficacy and safety of CPX-351 versus 7 + 3 chemotherapy by European LeukemiaNet 2017 risk subgroups in older adults with newly diagnosed, high-risk/secondary AML: post hoc analysis of a randomized, phase 3 trial.

Jorge E Cortes, Tara L Lin, Kobby Asubonteng, Stefan Faderl, Jeffrey E Lancet, Thomas Prebet

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Hematopoietic Aging and Leukemia: Mechanistic and Therapeutic Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Transplant options and outcomes for TP53 myeloid disease.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
  16. AML in the Elderly - When less may be more.Current oncology reports · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jorge E CortesDepartment of Leukemia, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Jorge.Cortes@augusta.edu.
Tara L LinDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Kobby AsubontengDepartment of Biostatistics, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Stefan FaderlDepartment of Clinical Development, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Jeffrey E LancetDepartment of Malignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Thomas PrebetDepartment of Hematology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CPX-351 (Europe: Vyxeos

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteNeoplasms, Second PrimaryAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCytarabineDaunorubicinHumansCPX-351CytarabineDaunorubicinAcute myeloid leukemiaChemotherapyCPX-351European LeukemiaNet 2017 risk subgroupPost hoc

Identifiers

PMID36289532
PMCPMC9598030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.