Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36289472›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2022

Physical performance in older age by sex and educational level: the HUNT Study.

Kjerstin N Melsæter, Gro G Tangen, Håvard K Skjellegrind, Beatrix Vereijken, Bjørn H Strand, Pernille Thingstad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Associations of spirometricFrontiers in public health · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Daily physical activity in older adults across levels of care: the HUNT Trondheim 70 + study.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Changes in Physical Performance among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Six Years.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kjerstin N MelsæterDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway. kjerstin.n.melsater@ntnu.no.
Gro G TangenThe Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
Håvard K SkjellegrindDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, HUNT Research Centre, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Levanger, Norway.
Beatrix VereijkenDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Bjørn H StrandThe Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
Pernille ThingstadDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOSykehuset i Vestfold · NOLevanger Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulation-based studies on physical performance provide important information on older people's health but rarely include the oldest and least-healthy segment of the population. The aim of this study was to provide representative estimates of physical performance by age, sex, and educational level based on recent data from a population-based health study in Norway that includes older people with a wide range in age and function.

methodsIn the fourth wave of the Trøndelag Health Study (2017-2019), all participants aged 70 + were invited to an additional examination of physical performance assessed by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), either by attending a testing station or by visits from ambulatory teams. The distribution and variation in SPPB total and subscores, as well as gait speed, are presented by sex, age, and educational level.

resultsThe SPPB was registered in 11,394 individuals; 54.8% were women; the age range was 70-105.4 years, with 1,891 persons aged 85 + . SPPB scores decreased by 0.27 points (men) and 0.33 points (women) for each year of age, and gait speed by 0.02 m/sec (men) and 0.03 m/sec (women). Using a frailty cut-off for gait speed at < 0.8 m/sec, the proportion of participants categorized as frail increased from 13.9% in the 70-74 years cohort to 73.9% in participants aged 85 + . Level of education [Formula: see text] 10 years corresponded to 6 years (men) and 4 years (women) earlier onset of frailty (SPPB [Formula: see text] 9) compared to education [Formula: see text] 14 years.

conclusionWe found that the SPPB captured a gradual decline and wide distribution in physical performance in old age. The results provide information about physical performance, health status, and risk profiles at a population level and can serve as reference data for clinicians, researchers, and healthcare planners.

Indexed as

FrailtyAgedAged, 80 and overEducational StatusFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMalePhysical Functional PerformanceWalking SpeedEducationGait speedOlder adultsPhysical functionPopulation studySex differencesShort physical performance battery

Identifiers

PMID36289472
PMCPMC9597987
OpenAlexW4307250476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.