ArticleScientific reports2022
Computerised prediction of healing for venous leg ulcers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D Measurement of Chronic Wounds in Routine Care: A Review with Practical Guidance for Smartphone Photogrammetry.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Using Textural Analysis of Thermal Imaging to Predict Healing Status of Diabetes-Related Neuropathic Foot Ulcers: Protocol for a Co-Design and Longitudinal Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Applications for Venous Ulcer Assessment and Wound Care: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Role of Natural Hydrogels in Enhancing Wound Healing: From Biomaterials to Bioactive Therapies.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Scoping Review on the Use of Point-Of-Care Infrared Thermography Devices for Assessing Various Wound Types.International wound journal · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early prediction of delayed healing for venous leg ulcers could improve management outcomes by enabling earlier initiation of adjuvant therapies. In this paper, we propose a framework for computerised prediction of healing for venous leg ulcers assessed in home settings using thermal images of the 0 week. Wound data of 56 older participants over 12 weeks were used for the study. Thermal images of the wounds were collected in their homes and labelled as healed or unhealed at the 12th week follow up. Textural information of the thermal images at week 0 was extracted. Thermal images of unhealed wounds had a higher variation of grey tones distribution. We demonstrated that the first three principal components of the textural features from one timepoint can be used as an input to a Bayesian neural network to discriminate between healed and unhealed wounds. Using the optimal Bayesian neural network, the classification results showed 78.57% sensitivity and 60.00% specificity. This non-contact method, incorporating machine learning, can provide a computerised prediction of this delay in the first assessment (week 0) in participants' homes compared to the current method that is able to do this in 3rd week and requires contact digital planimetry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.