ArticleScientific reports2022
Real world data on the prognostic significance of monocytopenia in myelodysplastic syndrome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- ICSH Recommendations for Monocyte Cell Lineage Morphologic Identification, Nomenclature Harmonization, and Utilization as a Biomarker.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Review
- Prognostic impact of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms/syndromes.Blood research · 2025Article
- Improving MDS Risk Assessment: The Role of Monocytopenia and Lymphocytopenia Beyond IPSS-R.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Epidemiology, Clinical Data, and Management of Aseptic Abscess Syndrome: Review of Published Cases Outside France.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monocytopenia is a common finding in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), but although monocytes may exhibit prognostic significance in MDS due to their role in innate immunity, they have not been incorporated in any prognostic scoring system for MDS. In this study, we analyzed national registry data from 1719 adults with MDS. Monocytopenia was present in 29.5% of the patients and was correlated with the presence of excess blasts and higher revised international prognostic scoring system categories. Univariate analysis showed that monocytopenia was prognostic of a lower overall survival [(OS), 32.0 versus 65.0 months, p < 0.001], while it retained its prognostic significance in a multivariate model comprising anemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia [hazard ratio (HR) for OS, 1.320, p < 0.001]. Moreover, it was prognostic of a lower leukemia free survival (LFS) both in univariate analysis and in a multivariate model comprising cytopenias, bone marrow blasts, and cytogenetic risk (HR for LFS 1.27, p = 0.031). The findings regarding OS and LFR were exclusive or more pronounced in lower risk patients, respectively. Moreover, monocytopenia could divide the low and intermediate risk groups of IPSS-R in prognostically distinct subgroups. Our results redefine the prognostic role of monocytes in MDS and set the basis for further studies to validate our results and expand our knowledge on the prognostic significance of monocytopenia in MDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.