Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36289273›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy assessed in a four-waves survey.

Giovanni de Girolamo, Clarissa Ferrari, Valentina Candini, Chiara Buizza, Gemma Calamandrei, Marta Caserotti, Teresa Gavaruzzi, Paolo Girardi, Katrine Bach Habersaat, Lorella Lotto and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Giovanni de Girolamo *Psychiatric Epidemiology and Evaluation Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni Di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Via Pilastroni 4, 25125, Brescia, Italy. gdegirolamo@fatebenefratelli.eu.
Clarissa Ferrari *Service of Statistics, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni Di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Valentina CandiniPsychiatric Epidemiology and Evaluation Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni Di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Via Pilastroni 4, 25125, Brescia, Italy.
Chiara BuizzaPsychiatric Epidemiology and Evaluation Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni Di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Via Pilastroni 4, 25125, Brescia, Italy.
Gemma CalamandreiCentre for Behavioral Science and Mental Health, Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Roma, Italy.
Marta CaserottiDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Teresa GavaruzziDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Paolo GirardiDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Katrine Bach HabersaatWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lorella LottoDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Martha ScherzerWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Fabrizio StaraceDepartment of Mental Health and Drug Abuse, AUSL Modena, Modena, Italy.
Alessandra TassoDepartment of Humanities, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Manuel ZampariniPsychiatric Epidemiology and Evaluation Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni Di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Via Pilastroni 4, 25125, Brescia, Italy.
Cristina ZarboPsychiatric Epidemiology and Evaluation Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni Di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Via Pilastroni 4, 25125, Brescia, Italy.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on the mental health and well-being (WB) of citizens. This cross-sectional study included 4 waves of data collection aimed at identifying profiles of individuals with different levels of WB. The study included a representative stratified sample of 10,013 respondents in Italy. The WHO 5-item well-being scale (WHO-5) was used for the assessment of WB. Different supervised machine learning approaches (multinomial logistic regression, partial least-square discriminant analysis-PLS-DA-, classification tree-CT-) were applied to identify individual characteristics with different WB scores, first in waves 1-2 and, subsequently, in waves 3 and 4. Forty-one percent of participants reported "Good WB", 30% "Poor WB", and 28% "Depression". Findings carried out using multinomial logistic regression show that Resilience was the most important variable able for discriminating the WB across all waves. Through the PLS-DA, Increased Unhealthy Behaviours proved to be the more important feature in the first two waves, while Financial Situation gained most relevance in the last two. COVID-19 Perceived Risk was relevant, but less than the other variables, across all waves. Interestingly, using the CT we were able to establish a cut-off for Resilience (equal to 4.5) that discriminated good WB with a probability of 65% in wave 4. Concluding, we found that COVID-19 had negative implications for WB. Governments should support evidence-based strategies considering factors that influence WB (i.e., Resilience, Perceived Risk, Healthy Behaviours, and Financial Situation).

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesHumansItalyMental HealthPandemicsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36289273
PMCPMC9606283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.