Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36289245›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Widely applicable, extended flow cytometric stem cell enumeration panel for quality control of advanced cellular products.

Katy Haussmann, Mathias Streitz, Anna Takvorian, Jana Grund, Zemra Skenderi, Carola Tietze-Bürger, Kamran Movassaghi, Annette Künkele, Agnieszka Blum, Lars Bullinger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Katy HaussmannCorporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Stem Cell Facility, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10353, Berlin, Germany. Katy.Haussmann@charite.de.
Mathias StreitzInstitute of Medical Immunology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Anna TakvorianCorporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Stem Cell Facility, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10353, Berlin, Germany.
Jana GrundCorporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Stem Cell Facility, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10353, Berlin, Germany.
Zemra SkenderiCorporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Stem Cell Facility, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10353, Berlin, Germany.
Carola Tietze-BürgerCorporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Stem Cell Facility, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10353, Berlin, Germany.
Kamran MovassaghiCorporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Stem Cell Facility, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10353, Berlin, Germany.
Annette KünkeleCorporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Stem Cell Facility, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10353, Berlin, Germany.
Agnieszka BlumArdigen, 30-394, Kraków, Poland.
Lars BullingerCorporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Stem Cell Facility, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10353, Berlin, Germany.
Freie Universität Berlin · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most widely used quality control assay for CD34 + hematopoietic stem cell product characterization is the protocol established by the International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering (ISHAGE). While this protocol is still the gold standard for stem cell enumeration and viability assessment, it does not include T cell enumeration, which is nowadays mandatory for assaying standard allogeneic grafts and various advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs). In accordance, we have developed and extensively validated a new approach for a more comprehensive characterization of hematopoietic cellular products using a pre-formulated dried antibody format panel. In addition to the counting beads, the typical markers CD45 fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and CD34 phycoerythrin (PE), as well as the viability dye 7-amino actinomycin D (7-AAD), our novel pre-formulated panel also contains CD3 Pacific Blue (PB) and CD19 allophycocyanin (APC) in the same tube, thereby allowing a combined calculation of leucocytes, stem cells, T and B cells. Showing high linearity, sensitivity and accuracy, our approach is easy to implement and enables a more in-depth characterization of the cellular product under release testing conditions. In addition, the dried pre-formulated antibody approach increases assay reliability compared to the standard antibody panel.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem CellsPhycoerythrinAntigens, CD34Flow CytometryFluorescein-5-isothiocyanateQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsAntigens, CD34Fluorescein-5-isothiocyanatePhycoerythrin

Identifiers

PMID36289245
PMCPMC9605971
OpenAlexW4307566341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.