Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36289106›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2022

Learning curve and functional outcomes after laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostate hyperplasia according to surgeon's caseload.

M Kosiba, B Hoeh, M N Welte, M J Krimphove, K Vitucci, N Lindemann, J Schröder, L Jost, F E Schmidt, A von Hollen and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. TheTranslational andrology and urology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M KosibaDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. marina.kosiba@kgu.de.
B HoehDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
M N WelteDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
M J KrimphoveDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
K VitucciDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
N LindemannDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
J SchröderDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
L JostDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
F E SchmidtDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
A von HollenDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
L A KluthDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
P MandelDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
F C RoosDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
F K H ChunDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
A BeckerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the impact of surgical caseload on safety, efficacy, and functional outcomes of laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) applying a structured mentoring program.

methodsPatient characteristics, perioperative data, and functional outcomes were analyzed descriptively. Linear and logistic regression models analyzed the effect of caseload on complications, functional outcomes and operative speed. Within the structured mentoring program a senior surgeon was present for the first 24 procedures completely, for partial steps in procedures 25-49, and as needed thereafter.

resultsA total of 677 patients from our prospective institutional database (2017-2022) were included for analysis. Of these, 84 (12%), 75 (11%), 82 (12%), 106 (16%), and 330 patients (49%) were operated by surgeons at (A) < 25, (B) 25-49, (C) 50-99, (D) 100-199, and (E) ≥ 200 procedures. Preoperative characteristics were balanced (all p > 0.05) except for prostate volume, which increased with caseload. There was no significant difference in change of IPSS, Quality of life, ICIQ, pad usage, peak urine flow, residual urine, and major complications (Group A: 8.3 to E: 7.6%, p = 0.2) depending on the caseload. Caseload was not associated (Odds ratio: 0.7-1.4, p > 0.2) with major complications in the multivariable logistic regression model. Only operating time was significantly shorter with increasing caseload in the multivariable analysis (111-55 min, beta 23.9-62.9, p < 0.001).

conclusionWith a structured mentoring program, the safety and efficacy of LEP can be ensured even during the learning curve with very good outcome quality. Only the operating time decreases significantly with increasing experience of the surgeon.

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateLaser TherapyProstatic HyperplasiaSurgeonsTransurethral Resection of ProstateHumansHyperplasiaLearning CurveMaleProspective StudiesProstateQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeClavien−Dindo complicationsEfficacyHoLEPHolmium:yag laserMentoring programSafetySoLEPSurgical educationThulium fiber laser

Identifiers

PMID36289106
PMCPMC9712403
OpenAlexW4307431998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.