Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36288819›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2022

Scaling up of safety and quality improvement interventions in perioperative care: a systematic scoping review of implementation strategies and effectiveness.

Michelle C White, Shalini Ahuja, Kimberly Peven, Susanna Ritchie McLean, Dina Hadi, Ijeoma Okonkwo, Olivia Clancy, Maryann Turner, Jaymie Claire Ang Henry, Nick Sevdalis

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michelle C WhiteDepartment of Anaesthesia, Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5118-1054
Shalini AhujaMethodologies Research Division, Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Pallative Care, London, UK shalini.ahuja@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5433-3340
Kimberly PevenFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK.
Susanna Ritchie McLeanDepartment of Anesthesia, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Dina HadiDepartment of Anesthesia, Whittington Hospital, London, UK.
Ijeoma OkonkwoDepartment of Anaesthesia, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, London, UK.
Olivia ClancyDepartment of Anaesthesia, Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Maryann TurnerDepartment of Anaesthesia, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Jaymie Claire Ang HenryDepartment of Surgery, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3331-8704
Nick SevdalisCentre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, 5 billion people lack access to safe surgical care with more deaths due to lack of quality care rather than lack of access. While many proven quality improvement (QI) interventions exist in high-income countries, implementing them in low/middle-income countries (LMICs) faces further challenges. Currently, theory-driven, systematically articulated knowledge of the factors that support successful scale-up of QI in perioperative care in these settings is lacking. We aimed to identify all perioperative safety and QI interventions applied at scale in LMICs and evaluate their implementation mechanisms using implementation theory.

methodsSystematic scoping review of perioperative QI interventions in LMICs from 1960 to 2020. Studies were identified through Medline, EMBASE and Google Scholar. Data were extracted in two phases: (1) abstract review to identify the range of QI interventions; (2) studies describing scale-up (three or more sites), had full texts retrieved and analysed for; implementation strategies and scale-up frameworks used; and implementation outcomes reported.

resultsWe screened 45 128 articles, identifying 137 studies describing perioperative QI interventions across 47 countries. Only 31 of 137 (23%) articles reported scale-up with the most common intervention being the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. The most common implementation strategies were training and educating stakeholders, developing stakeholder relationships, and using evaluative and iterative strategies. Reporting of implementation mechanisms was generally poor; and although the components of scale-up frameworks were reported, relevant frameworks were rarely referenced.

conclusionMany studies report implementation of QI interventions, but few report successful scale-up from single to multiple-site implementation. Greater use of implementation science methodology may help determine what works, where and why, thereby aiding more widespread scale-up and dissemination of perioperative QI interventions.

Indexed as

Health ServicesQuality ImprovementDelivery of Health CareHumansPerioperative CareQuality of Health CareHealth services researchHealth systemsReviewSurgery

Identifiers

PMID36288819
PMCPMC9615995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.