Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36288709›Full record

ArticleCell reports2022

Cholinergic control of striatal GABAergic microcircuits.

Samet Kocaturk, Elif Beyza Guven, Fulva Shah, James M Tepper, Maxime Assous

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A mismatch between striatal cholinergic pauses and dopaminergic reward prediction errors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samet KocaturkCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 197 University Avenue, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
Elif Beyza GuvenCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 197 University Avenue, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
Fulva ShahCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 197 University Avenue, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
James M TepperCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 197 University Avenue, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
Maxime AssousCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 197 University Avenue, Newark, NJ 07102, USA. Electronic address: assous.maxime@gmail.com.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Nigrostriatal Dopamine FunctionR01NS034865 · NINDS · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI KOOS, TIBOR, TEPPER, JAMES M · 1997 to 2022
$9.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS034865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholinergic interneurons (CINs) are essential elements of striatal circuits and functions. Although acetylcholine signaling via muscarinic receptors (mAChRs) has been well studied, more recent data indicate that postsynaptic nicotinic receptors (nAChRs) located on striatal GABAergic interneurons (GINs) are equally critical. One example is that CIN stimulation induces large disynaptic inhibition of striatal projection neurons (SPNs) mediated by nAChR activation of GINs. Although these circuits are ideally positioned to modulate striatal output, the neurons involved are not definitively identified because of an incomplete mapping of CINs-GINs interconnections. Here, we show that CINs modulate four GINs populations via an intricate mechanism involving co-activation of presynaptic and postsynaptic mAChRs and nAChRs. Using optogenetics, we demonstrate the participation of tyrosine hydroxylase-expressing GINs in the disynaptic inhibition of SPNs via heterotypic electrical coupling with neurogliaform interneurons. Altogether, our results highlight the importance of CINs in regulating GINs microcircuits via complex synaptic/heterosynaptic mechanisms.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineReceptors, NicotinicCholinergic AgentsCholinergic NeuronsCorpus StriatumInterneuronsReceptors, MuscarinicTyrosine 3-MonooxygenaseAcetylcholineCholinergic AgentsReceptors, MuscarinicReceptors, NicotinicTyrosine 3-MonooxygenaseacetylcholineCP: Neuroscienceelectrical couplinggap junctioninterneuronsmuscarinicneurogliaformnicotinicoptogeneticprojection neuronsstriatumtyrosine hydroxylase

Identifiers

PMID36288709
PMCPMC9648160
OpenAlexW4307501611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.