Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36288547›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2023

Phase Ib Study of Telisotuzumab Vedotin in Combination With Erlotinib in Patients With c-Met Protein-Expressing Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

D Ross Camidge, Fabrice Barlesi, Jonathan W Goldman, Daniel Morgensztern, Rebecca Heist, Everett Vokes, Alex Spira, Eric Angevin, Wu-Chou Su, David S Hong and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. ADC Target Profiling in NSCLC: Generalizable AI Separates TROP-2 and cMET Phenotypes.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.

D Ross CamidgeUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO.ORCID 0000-0003-3430-3213
Fabrice BarlesiMultidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations Department, Aix Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Inserm U911 CRO2, Marseille, France.
Jonathan W GoldmanDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-4925-8243
Daniel MorgenszternWashington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0003-4349-2028
Rebecca HeistMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-7397-2009
Everett VokesUniversity of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-8645-8068
Alex SpiraVirginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute, Fairfax, VA.ORCID 0000-0003-1303-0447
Eric AngevinDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6249-7209
Wu-Chou SuNational Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
David S HongThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0001-8721-1609
John H StricklerDuke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-7579-1175
Monica MotwaniAbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL.
Martin DunbarAbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL.
Apurvasena ParikhAbbVie Inc, Redwood City, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-3711-8718
Elysa NoonAbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL.
Vincent BlotAbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL.
Jun WuAbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL.
Karen KellyUniversity of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-2235-6636
AbbVie (United States) · USDuke Medical Center · USInserm · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRMassachusetts General Hospital · USNational Cheng Kung University Hospital · TWThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUC Davis Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center · USVirginia Cancer Specialists · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Gina M Dayton · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOverexpression of c-Met protein and epidermal growth factor receptor ( PATIENTS AND

methodsThis study evaluated Teliso-V (2.7 mg/kg once every 21 days) plus erlotinib (150 mg once daily) in adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with c-Met+ NSCLC. Later enrollment required presence of an

resultsAs of January 2020, 42 patients were enrolled (N = 36 efficacy-evaluable). Neuropathies were the most common any-grade adverse events reported, with 24 of 42 patients (57%) experiencing at least one event. The pharmacokinetic profile of Teliso-V plus erlotinib was similar to Teliso-V monotherapy. Median PFS for all efficacy-evaluable patients was 5.9 months (95% CI, 2.8 to not reached). ORR for

conclusionTeliso-V plus erlotinib showed encouraging antitumor activity and acceptable toxicity in EGFR TKI-pretreated patients with

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideHumansMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsAntibodies, MonoclonalErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideProtein Kinase Inhibitorstelisotuzumab vedotin

Identifiers

PMID36288547
PMCPMC9928626
OpenAlexW4307431661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.