Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36288328›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2022

Enhanced mosquito vectorial capacity underlies the Cape Verde Zika epidemic.

Noah H Rose, Stéphanie Dabo, Silvânia da Veiga Leal, Massamba Sylla, Cheikh T Diagne, Oumar Faye, Ousmane Faye, Amadou A Sall, Carolyn S McBride, Louis Lambrechts

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Vector competence acrossJournal of virology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Rapid urban evolution of the dengue mosquito in West African cities.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Assessment of the Risk of Exotic Zika Virus Strain Transmission byTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Article
  16. Recovery of metagenomic data from theWellcome open research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Noah H RoseDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.
Stéphanie DaboInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR2000, Insect-Virus Interactions Unit, Paris, France.
Silvânia da Veiga LealLaboratório de Entomologia Médica, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Pública, Praia, Cabo Verde.
Massamba SyllaDepartment of Livestock Sciences and Techniques, University Sine Saloum El Hadji Ibrahima NIASS, Kaffrine, Senegal.
Cheikh T DiagneInstitut Pasteur Dakar, Arbovirus and Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers Unit, Dakar, Senegal.
Oumar FayeInstitut Pasteur Dakar, Arbovirus and Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers Unit, Dakar, Senegal.
Ousmane FayeInstitut Pasteur Dakar, Arbovirus and Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers Unit, Dakar, Senegal.
Amadou A SallInstitut Pasteur Dakar, Arbovirus and Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers Unit, Dakar, Senegal.
Carolyn S McBrideDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.
Louis LambrechtsInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR2000, Insect-Virus Interactions Unit, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5958-2138
Institut Pasteur de Dakar · SNCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRPrinceton University · USInstituto Nacional de Estatística · CVUniversité du Sine Saloum El-Hâdj Ibrahima NIASS · SN

Funding

Genetic Analysis of Mosquito Olfactory Preference for HumansR00DC012069 · NIDCD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MCBRIDE, CAROLYN SARAH · 2014 to 2016
$738k
NIDCD NIH HHS R00 DC012069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The explosive emergence of Zika virus (ZIKV) across the Pacific and Americas since 2007 was associated with hundreds of thousands of human cases and severe outcomes, including congenital microcephaly caused by ZIKV infection during pregnancy. Although ZIKV was first isolated in Uganda, Africa has so far been exempt from large-scale ZIKV epidemics, despite widespread susceptibility among African human populations. A possible explanation for this pattern is natural variation among populations of the primary vector of ZIKV, the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Globally invasive populations of Ae. aegypti outside of Africa are considered effective ZIKV vectors because they are human specialists with high intrinsic ZIKV susceptibility, whereas African populations of Ae. aegypti across the species' native range are predominantly generalists with low intrinsic ZIKV susceptibility, making them less likely to spread viruses in the human population. We test this idea by studying a notable exception to the patterns observed across most of Africa: Cape Verde experienced a large ZIKV outbreak in 2015 to 2016. We find that local Ae. aegypti in Cape Verde have substantial human-specialist ancestry, show a robust behavioral preference for human hosts, and exhibit increased susceptibility to ZIKV infection, consistent with a key role for variation among mosquito populations in ZIKV epidemiology. These findings suggest that similar human-specialist populations of Ae. aegypti in the nearby Sahel region of West Africa, which may be expanding in response to rapid urbanization, could serve as effective vectors for ZIKV in the future.

Indexed as

AedesEpidemicsZika VirusZika Virus InfectionAnimalsCabo VerdeHumansMosquito VectorsSaliva

Identifiers

PMID36288328
PMCPMC9604947
OpenAlexW4307321261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.