Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36288187›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2022

Deep Learning Based Egg Fertility Detection.

Kerim Kürşat Çevik, Hasan Erdinç Koçer, Mustafa Boğa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Egg fertility assessment system using deep learning technology.Journal of animal science and technology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Detection of Hatching Information of Meat Duck Eggs Based on Deep Learning.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kerim Kürşat ÇevikFaculty of Applied Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07070, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2921-506X
Hasan Erdinç KoçerFaculty of Technology, Selçuk University, Konya 42130, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0799-2140
Mustafa BoğaBor Vocational School, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Niğde 51700, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8277-9262

Funding

Akdeniz University FBA-2019-4898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the implementation of deep learning (DL) approaches to the fertile egg-recognition problem, based on incubator images. In this study, we aimed to classify chicken eggs according to both segmentation and fertility status with a Mask R-CNN-based approach. In this manner, images can be handled by a single DL model to successfully perform detection, classification and segmentation of fertile and infertile eggs. Two different test processes were used in this study. In the first test application, a data set containing five fertile eggs was used. In the second, testing was carried out on the data set containing 18 fertile eggs. For evaluating this study, we used AP, one of the most important metrics for evaluating object detection and segmentation models in computer vision. When the results obtained were examined, the optimum threshold value (IoU) value was determined as 0.7. According to the IoU of 0.7, it was observed that all fertile eggs in the incubator were determined correctly on the third day of both test periods. Considering the methods used and the ease of the designed system, it can be said that a very successful system has been designed according to the studies in the literature. In order to increase the segmentation performance, it is necessary to carry out an experimental study to improve the camera and lighting setup prepared for taking the images.

Indexed as

deep learningegg fertilityincubator imagesMask R-CNN

Identifiers

PMID36288187
PMCPMC9609447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.