Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36288147›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2022

Influence of Using Various Levels of Protein Concentrate in Rations of Ayrshire Dairy Cows on Rumen Microbiome, Reproductive Traits and Economic Efficiency.

Nikolai P Buryakov, Dmitrii E Aleshin, Maria A Buryakova, Anastasya S Zaikina, Georgy Y Laptev, Larisa A Ilina, Aleksandr S Petrov, Nikolay M Kostomakhin, Ahmed I El Sheikh, Ferial M Sahwan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Nikolai P BuryakovDepartment of Feeding Animals, Institute of Animal Science and Biology, Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 127434 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6776-0835
Dmitrii E AleshinDepartment of Feeding Animals, Institute of Animal Science and Biology, Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 127434 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4119-1451
Maria A BuryakovaDepartment of Feeding Animals, Institute of Animal Science and Biology, Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 127434 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4350-5725
Anastasya S ZaikinaDepartment of Feeding Animals, Institute of Animal Science and Biology, Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 127434 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6624-9974
Georgy Y LaptevMolecular Genetic Laboratory, BIOTROF+ Ltd., 196650 Saint-Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8795-6659
Larisa A IlinaMolecular Genetic Laboratory, BIOTROF+ Ltd., 196650 Saint-Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2789-4844
Aleksandr S PetrovDepartment of Feeding Animals, Institute of Animal Science and Biology, Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 127434 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2709-1681
Nikolay M KostomakhinDepartment of Feeding Animals, Institute of Animal Science and Biology, Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 127434 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3987-0372
Ahmed I El SheikhDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Hofuf 31982, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6855-3558
Ferial M SahwanAnimal Husbandry and Wealth Development Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria 5410012, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-8176-4763
Mohamed M FathalaDepartment of Feeding Animals, Institute of Animal Science and Biology, Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 127434 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1150-1719
Russian State Agrarian University - Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy · RUSaint-Petersburg State Agrarian University · RUAlexandria University · EGKing Faisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal feeding research has revealed a close relationship between the chemical composition and nutritional value of cow rations, the number of rumen bacterial communities and animal productivity. Our present research aimed to investigate the outcome of inclusion of different levels of protein concentrate in rations of Ayrshire dairy cows in relation to the rumen microbiome, reproductive traits and economic value. Forty-five Ayrshire cows were divided into three groups (15 in each). The first control group 0 AM was fed the basal ration, while the second 1 AM and third 2 AM groups were fed the basic ration with the sunflower cake replaced by different levels of protein concentrate Agro-Matic (1 and 1.5 kg/head/day, respectively). Ruminal fluid samples, reproductive parameters and economic value were studied. During the early lactation period, 120 days in milk (DIM), the number of pathogenic microorganisms decreased in both the 1 AM and 2 AM groups when compared with the control group 0 AM; moreover, a significant decrease in Peptococcus bacteria was recorded in the 1 AM group, while Fusobacterium decreased in the 2 AM group. At the end of lactation, the total number of cellulolytic bacteria increased with the use of protein concentrate in animals of the 1 AM group when compared with the control group. Regarding undesirable bacteria, the 2 AM group recorded the highest value for Lactobacilli and Actinobacteria when compared with the 0 AM group (0.18 and 8.90 vs. 0.04 and 4.24), and the differences were significant (p < 0.05). The insemination index and the duration of the days open period decreased in the 2 AM group, while the differences were p > 0.05. The profitability of milk production increased by 2.76% and 6.28% in both supplemented groups, and the differences compared to the 0 AM group were significant. We conclude that the supplementation of Agro-Matic caused no deviations from the normal standards of cellulolytic, amylolytic, transit and pathogenic bacteria, no impact on reproductive functions and significantly improved the profitability of the milk production process of Ayrshire dairy cows.

Indexed as

Ayrshire breedeconomic efficiencyproteinrationreproduction abilityrumen microbiome

Identifiers

PMID36288147
PMCPMC9610960
OpenAlexW4298003233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.