Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36288045›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2022

Community Health Nurses' Perspective on the Introduced Rational Drug Use Policy in Primary Care Settings in Thailand: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.

Sophaphan Intahphuak, Thaworn Lorga, Worawan Tipwareerom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. One Health, One Future: A Unified Approach to a Balanced Ecosystem.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sophaphan IntahphuakSchool of Nursing, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0013-8563
Thaworn LorgaFaculty of Nursing, Chiang Rai Rajabhat University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand.
Worawan TipwareeromFaculty of Nursing, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand.

Funding

The Center of Excellence for Hill Tribe Health Research, and The National Research Council of Thailand No.16/2561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo address the problems related to drug resistance and medication safety, the rational drug use (RDU) policy has been implemented in Thailand since 2014. Theoretically, the policy was supposed to bring drastic changes to the way clinicians prescribe medications and its impacts on clinical practice, however, it has not yet been investigated. The study aimed to describe the experience of community health nurses with regard to the impact of RDU policy implementation on their practices.

methodsFocus group interviews and in-depth interviews with community nurses were conducted. Thematic analysis was performed.

resultsFive themes emerged from the analysis, namely, (1) a welcome opportunity, (2) RDU as the quality of healthcare, (3) multidisciplinary collaboration, (4) reinventing productive interactions between nurses and patients, and (5) challenges over control of medications prescribed or purchased elsewhere.

conclusionsImplementing RDU in primary care provides opportunities for protecting individual patients and public health as well as safeguarding against professional prescription error. This can be made possible by adopting a systemic approach to changes. Additional educational and organizational support will optimize health professionals' contribution to the implementation and hence optimal outcomes of this important policy.

Indexed as

medicine prescribingmedicine use policynursing prescriberrational drug usethailand primary healthcare

Identifiers

PMID36288045
PMCPMC9611984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.