ReviewTropical medicine and infectious disease2022
Transforming Growth Factor-β Concerning Malarial Infection and Severity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Association between interleukin-2 cytokine levels and Plasmodium infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Interleukin-5 levels in relation to malaria severity: a systematic review.Malaria journal · 2023Pooled it
- Assessment of Cytokines TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, TGF-beta-1, and IL-10 in Malaria Patients of the River Nile State , Sudan: A critical study of immune response.BMC immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is important in the pathophysiology of malaria, but its role in acute and severe malaria is largely unknown. As a result, this study used a meta-analysis approach to investigate the difference in TGF-β levels between several groups of malaria patients and healthy controls. The systematic review protocol was registered at PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022318864). From inception to 7 March 2022, studies that reported TGF-β levels in patients with uncomplicated and healthy controls and patients with severe and uncomplicated malaria were searched in PubMed, Scopus and Embase. The assessment of the quality of the included studies was conducted according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Qualitative and quantitative syntheses were performed to narratively describe and quantitatively pool the mean difference (MD) in TGF-β levels between uncomplicated malaria and healthy controls, and between severe and uncomplicated malaria, using a random-effects model. A total of 1027 relevant articles were identified, and 13 studies were included for syntheses. The meta-analysis results show 233 patients with uncomplicated malaria and 239 healthy controls. Patients with uncomplicated malaria (233 cases) had lower mean TGF-β levels than healthy controls (239 cases; p < 0.01, pooled MD = −14.72 pg/mL, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = −20.46 to 8.99 pg/mL, I2 = 98.82%, seven studies). The meta-analysis found no difference in mean TGF-β levels between patients with severe malaria (367 cases) and patients with uncomplicated malaria (180 cases; p = 0.11, pooled MD = −6.07 pg/mL, 95% CI = −13.48 to 1.35 pg/mL, I2 = 97.73%, six studies). The meta-analysis demonstrated decreased TGF-β levels in patients with uncomplicated malaria compared to healthy controls. In addition, no difference in TGF-β levels was found between patients with severe and uncomplicated malaria. More research is needed to determine whether TGF-β levels could be a candidate marker for malarial infection or disease severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.