Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36287916›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2022

An analysis of the effects of limited training data in distributed learning scenarios for brain age prediction.

Raissa Souza, Pauline Mouches, Matthias Wilms, Anup Tuladhar, Sönke Langner, Nils D Forkert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Foundation model-driven distributed learning for enhanced retinal age prediction.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Raissa SouzaDepartment of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7455-3383
Pauline MouchesDepartment of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Matthias WilmsDepartment of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Anup TuladharDepartment of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3942-2732
Sönke LangnerInstitute for Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Nils D ForkertDepartment of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2556-3224

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDistributed learning avoids problems associated with central data collection by training models locally at each site. This can be achieved by federated learning (FL) aggregating multiple models that were trained in parallel or training a single model visiting sites sequentially, the traveling model (TM). While both approaches have been applied to medical imaging tasks, their performance in limited local data scenarios remains unknown. In this study, we specifically analyze FL and TM performances when very small sample sizes are available per site. MATERIALS AND

methods2025 T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans were used to investigate the effect of sample sizes on FL and TM for brain age prediction. We evaluated models across 18 scenarios varying the number of samples per site (1, 2, 5, 10, and 20) and the number of training rounds (20, 40, and 200).

resultsOur results demonstrate that the TM outperforms FL, for every sample size examined. In the extreme case when each site provided only one sample, FL achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 18.9 ± 0.13 years, while the TM achieved a MAE of 6.21 ± 0.50 years, comparable to central learning (MAE = 5.99 years). DISCUSSION: Although FL is more commonly used, our study demonstrates that TM is the best implementation for small sample sizes.

conclusionThe TM offers new opportunities to apply machine learning models in rare diseases and pediatric research but also allows even small hospitals to contribute small datasets.

Indexed as

BrainMachine LearningChildData CollectionHospitalsHumansSample Sizebrain age predictiondistributed learningmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID36287916
PMCPMC9748540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.