ArticleACS synthetic biology2022
Genetic Code Expansion in
Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Facile Synthesis of H-L-Photo-Lysine and Its Genetic Incorporation Into Proteins.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026Article
- Multi-strain analysis ofmSystems · 2026Article
- Synthetic Biology of Plants and Microbes for Agriculture, Environment, and Future Applications.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Multi-strain Analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Cold Plasma Treatment Facilitated the Conversion of Lignin-Derived Aldehyde for Pseudomonas putida.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Genetic Code Expansion: Recent Developments and Emerging Applications.Chemical reviews · 2025Review
- Cellular Site-Specific Incorporation of Noncanonical Amino Acids in Synthetic Biology.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- An unnatural amino acid dependent, conditional Pseudomonas vaccine prevents bacterial infection.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Review
- Evolution and synthetic biology.Current opinion in microbiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.