ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2022
Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence Resulted Negative on [
Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Focusing on Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen in Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Prostate Cancer.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- The role of PSMA-based radioligand therapy in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Review
- Dual targeting PET tracer [Theranostics · 2025Article
- Comparative dosimetric evaluation of 68Ga-PSMA and 18F-Choline PET/CT imaging in prostate cancer: implications for radiation safety and SUVmax correlation.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- mCRPC progression of disease after [Urology case reports · 2024Article
- Preliminary Findings of the Role of FAPi in Prostate Cancer Theranostics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Histology and PSMA Expression on Immunohistochemistry in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: Comparison withCancers · 2023Article
- Choline PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For prostate cancer (PCa) biochemical recurrence (BCR), the primarily suggested imaging technique by the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines is prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PET/CT). Indeed, the increased detection rate of PSMA PET/CT for early BCR has led to a fast and wide acceptance of this novel technology. However, PCa is a very heterogeneous disease, not always easily assessable with the highly specific PSMA PET with around 10% of cases occuring without PSMA expression. In this paper, we present the case of a patient with PCa BCR that resulted negative on [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.