Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36287801›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2022

Computed Tomographic Imaging Features of COVID-19 Pneumonia Caused by the Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant in a German Nested Cohort Pilot Study Group.

Esther Askani, Katharina Mueller-Peltzer, Julian Madrid, Marvin Knoke, Dunja Hasic, Fabian Bamberg, Christopher L Schlett, Prerana Agarwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Esther AskaniMedical Center, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Katharina Mueller-PeltzerMedical Center, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2490-7611
Julian MadridPneumology, Angiology and Intensive Care, Department of Cardiology, Ortenau Klinikum, 77933 Lahr, Germany.
Marvin KnokeFaculty of Theology, Department of Protestant Theology, University of Heidelberg, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Dunja HasicMedical Center, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Fabian BambergMedical Center, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Christopher L SchlettMedical Center, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Prerana AgarwalMedical Center, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate CT (computed tomography) imaging differences for the Delta and the Omicron variant in COVID-19 infection.

methodsThe study population was derived from a retrospective study cohort investigating chest CT imaging patterns in vaccinated and nonvaccinated COVID-19 patients. CT imaging patterns of COVID-19 infection were evaluated by qualitative and semiquantitative scoring systems, as well as imaging pattern analysis.

resultsA total of 60 patients (70.00% male, 62.53 ± 17.3 years, Delta: 43 patients, Omicron: 17 patients) were included. Qualitative scoring systems showed a significant correlation with virus variants; "typical appearance" and "very high" degrees of suspicion were detected more often in patients with Delta (RSNA:

conclusionThe Delta variant had significantly more extensive lung involvement and showed changes classified as "typical" more often than the Omicron variant, while the Omicron variant was more likely associated with CT findings such as "absence of pulmonary changes". A significant correlation between the Delta variant and the vacuolar sign was observed.

Indexed as

COVID-19FemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Tomography, X-Ray Computedchest CTCOVID-19Deltalung involvementOmicronSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36287801
PMCPMC9607412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.