Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36287604›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2022

A Smartphone App to Promote Patient Activation and Support Shared Decision-making in People With a Diagnosis of Schizophrenia in Outpatient Treatment Settings (Momentum Trial): Randomized Controlled Assessor-Blinded Trial.

Tobias Vitger, Carsten Hjorthøj, Stephen F Austin, Lone Petersen, Esben Sandvik Tønder, Merete Nordentoft, Lisa Korsbek

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03554655 (The Momentum Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03554655 nacompletednot on this map

The Momentum Trial: The Efficacy of Using a Smartphone Application to Support Shared Decision Making Through Patient Activation in People With a Diagnosis of Schizophrenia in Outpatient Treatment Settings

TypeinterventionalSponsorMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg HospitalRan2019 to 2022Enrolled194ConditionsSchizophrenia, Schizotypal and Delusional DisordersArmsMomentum app
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Mend the Gap: Online User-Led Adjuvant Treatment for Psychosis: A Systematic Review on Recent Findings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tobias VitgerCompetence Center for Rehabilitation and Recovery, Mental Health Center Ballerup, Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark, Ballerup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7492-5493
Carsten HjorthøjCopenhagen Research Center for Mental Health - CORE, Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6943-4785
Stephen F AustinPsychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatry Region Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5988-0565
Lone PetersenCompetence Center for Rehabilitation and Recovery, Mental Health Center Ballerup, Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark, Ballerup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7775-966X
Esben Sandvik TønderThe Mental Health Services of Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1695-9251
Merete NordentoftDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4895-7023
Lisa KorsbekThe Mental Health Centre Odense, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7610-7125
Mental Health Services · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKRegion Zealand · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShared decision-making (SDM) is a process aimed at facilitating patient-centered care by ensuring that the patient and provider are actively involved in treatment decisions. In mental health care, SDM has been advocated as a means for the patient to gain or regain control and responsibility over their life and recovery process. To support the process of patient-centered care and SDM, digital tools may have advantages in terms of accessibility, structure, and reminders.

objectiveIn this randomized controlled trial, we aimed to investigate the effect of a digital tool to support patient activation and SDM.

methodsThe trial was designed as a randomized, assessor-blinded, 2-armed, parallel-group multicenter trial investigating the use of a digital SDM intervention for 6 months compared with treatment as usual. Participants with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizotypal or delusional disorder were recruited from 9 outpatient treatment sites in the Capital Region of Denmark. The primary outcome was the self-reported level of activation at the postintervention time point. The secondary outcomes included self-efficacy, hope, working alliance, satisfaction, preparedness for treatment consultation, symptom severity, and level of functioning. Explorative outcomes on the effect of the intervention at the midintervention time point along with objective data on the use of the digital tool were collected.

resultsIn total, 194 participants were included. The intention-to-treat analysis revealed a statistically significant effect favoring the intervention group on patient activation (mean difference 4.39, 95% CI 0.99-7.79; Cohen d=0.33; P=.01), confidence in communicating with one's provider (mean difference 1.85, 95% CI 0.01-3.69; Cohen d=0.24; P=.05), and feeling prepared for decision-making (mean difference 5.12, 95% CI 0.16-10.08; Cohen d=0.27; P=.04). We found no effect of the digital SDM tool on treatment satisfaction, hope, self-efficacy, working alliance, severity of symptoms, level of functioning, use of antipsychotic medicine, and number or length of psychiatric hospital admissions.

conclusionsThis trial showed a significant effect of a digital SDM tool on the subjective level of patient activation, confidence in communicating with one's provider, and feeling prepared for decision-making at the postintervention time point. The effect size was smaller than the 0.42 effect size that we had anticipated and sampled for. The trial contributes to the evidence on how digital tools may support patient-centered care and SDM in mental health care.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03554655; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03554655. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2143-2.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsMobile ApplicationsSchizophreniaDecision MakingHumansOutpatientsPatient ParticipationAntipsychotic Agentsdigital interventionearly interventionmHealthmobile healthmobile phonepatient activationrandomized clinical trialschizophreniaschizotypalshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID36287604
PMCPMC9647453
OpenAlexW4295953885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.