Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36287589›Full record

ArticleJMIR perioperative medicine2022

Outcomes With a Mobile Digital Health Platform for Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: Retrospective Analysis.

Vishal Venkatraman, Elayna P Kirsch, Emily Luo, Sameer Kunte, Madison Ponder, Ziad F Gellad, Beiyu Liu, Hui-Jie Lee, Sin-Ho Jung, Michael M Haglund and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR perioperative medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vishal VenkatramanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3485-4026
Elayna P KirschDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1906-2693
Emily Luo *Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2237-3521
Sameer Kunte *Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5235-5941
Madison PonderHiggs Boson Health, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4933-7216
Ziad F GelladHiggs Boson Health, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7212-3304
Beiyu LiuDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6706-9729
Hui-Jie LeeDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6060-8443
Sin-Ho JungDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1473-7236
Michael M HaglundDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6332-0808
Shivanand P LadDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4991-5319
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

Support for QA/QC for Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002553 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JENNIFER S, MCNAMARA, JAMES O. · 2018 to 2023
$58.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital health solutions have been shown to enhance outcomes for individuals with chronic medical illnesses, but few have been validated for surgical patients. The digital health platform ManageMySurgery (MMS) has been validated for spine surgery as a feasible method for patients along their surgical journey through in-app education and completion of patient-reported outcomes surveys.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to determine the rates of 90-day emergency room (ER) visits, readmissions, and complications in patients undergoing spine surgery using MMS compared to patients using traditional perioperative care alone.

methodsPatients undergoing spine surgery at a US-based academic hospital were invited to use MMS perioperatively between December 2017 and September 2021. All patients received standard perioperative care and were classified as MMS users if they logged into the app. Demographic information and 90-day outcomes were acquired via electronic health record review. The odds ratios of having 90-day ER visits, readmissions, mild complications, and severe complications between the MMS and non-MMS groups were estimated using logistic regression models.

resultsA total of 1015 patients were invited, with 679 using MMS. MMS users and nonusers had similar demographics: the average ages were 57.9 (SD 12.5) years and 61.5 (SD 12.7) years, 54.1% (367/679) and 47.3% (159/336) were male, and 90.1% (612/679) and 88.7% (298/336) had commercial or Medicare insurance, respectively. Cervical fusions (559/1015, 55.07%) and single-approach lumbar fusions (231/1015, 22.76%) were the most common procedures for all patients. MMS users had a lower 90-day readmission rate (55/679, 8.1%) than did nonusers (30/336, 8.9%). Mild complications (MMS: 56/679, 8.3%; non-MMS: 32/336, 9.5%) and severe complications (MMS: 66/679, 9.7%; non-MMS: 43/336, 12.8%) were also lower in MMS users. MMS users had a lower 90-day ER visit rate (MMS: 62/679, 9.1%; non-MMS: 45/336, 13.4%). After adjustments were made for age and sex, the odds of having 90-day ER visits for MMS users were 32% lower than those for nonusers, but this difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.45-1.02; P=.06).

conclusionsThis is one of the first studies to show differences in acute outcomes for people undergoing spine surgery who use a digital health app. This study found a correlation between MMS use and fewer postsurgical ER visits in a large group of spine surgery patients. A planned randomized controlled trial will provide additional evidence of whether this digital health tool can be used as an intervention to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

digital healthmHealthmobile appmobile applicationmobile healthpostoperativerecoveryspine surgerysurgerysurgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID36287589
PMCPMC9647464
OpenAlexW4307432693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.