Trial reportAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2023
A Patient-Centered Perspective of Molluscum Contagiosum as Reported by B-SIMPLE4 Clinical Trial Patients and Caregivers: Global Impression of Change and Exit Interview Substudy Results.
Trial report in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04535531 (A Phase 3 Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel Group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of SB206 and Vehicle Gel Once Daily in the Treatment of Molluscum Contagiosum), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3 Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel Group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of SB206 and Vehicle Gel Once Daily in the Treatment of Molluscum Contagiosum
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond Numbers: Uses and Value of In-Trial Interview Data for Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Decision Making.The patient · 2026Review
- Caregiver-reported Patient Experiences with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Qualitative In-trial Interviews 1 Year After Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec in the Pivotal EMBARK Trial.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Zelsuvmi for Molluscum Contagiosum: Clinical Evidence, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Significance.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Qualitative In-trial Interviews: Methods, Challenges, and Best Practice.The patient · 2025Article
- Molluscum contagiosum survey - common approach and attitude towards treatment and research in Dutch general practice.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Berdazimer Sodium: A Novel Nitric Oxide-Releasing Drug in Dermatology.Indian dermatology online journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMolluscum contagiosum is often characterized by persistent lesions and bothersome symptomology. What patients with molluscum contagiosum and/or caregivers consider to be meaningful measures of therapeutic success is unknown.
objectiveWe aimed to collect patient experience data and assess Global Impression of Change from patients and/or caregivers participating in a large phase III molluscum contagiosum interventional trial.
methodsThe Berdazimer Sodium In Molluscum Patients with LEsions (B-SIMPLE4) phase III study enrolled 891 patients with molluscum contagiosum. Patients were randomly assigned to berdazimer gel, 10.3% or vehicle gel applied once daily for 12 weeks. Assessments of participant and investigator perceptions of complete lesion clearance were collected at weeks 12 and 24 along with Global Impression of Change scores from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). A subset of 30 B-SIMPLE4 patients participated in the patient/caregiver experience exit interview to evaluate bothersome signs and symptoms.
resultsAt week 12, among participants with a ≥ 75% molluscum contagiosum lesion count reduction from baseline (as assessed by investigators), 99% (373/376) reported improvement. Perceptions of complete clearance at week 12 were nearly 40% for both participant-reported and investigator-reported Global Impression of Change in berdazimer group vs 20% in the vehicle group: 82% (322/392) of participants in the berdazimer group and 60% (237/394) in the vehicle group reported their molluscum contagiosum lesions were either very much improved or much improved at week 12. Similarly, investigators scored 80% (314/393) of berdazimer and 54% (215/396) of vehicle participants as very much improved or much improved. From the exit interview, the mean duration of participant-reported molluscum contagiosum was nearly 2 years. The most frequently reported molluscum contagiosum-related signs and symptoms were itch (n = 20), scarring (n = 18), and pain (n = 13). Visibility and contagiousness of molluscum contagiosum were the most bothersome aspects to participants. The most frequently reported psychosocial impacts were self-consciousness (n = 15) and embarrassment (n = 14). Lesion clearance was an expectation of 28/30 study participants. Overall, 26/30 reported being very satisfied (n = 18) or satisfied (n = 8) with the changes in their disease over the duration of the trial; 23/30 stated that the change in lesion count was meaningful. A mean reduction of 18 lesions (76% decrease) from the baseline lesion count was reported by participants (n = 28). Although 22 of 28 had less than complete lesion clearance, 17 of 22 reported that the reduction in the number of lesions was meaningful.
conclusionsMolluscum contagiosum lesion reductions, with or without complete clearance, may be considered a therapeutic "success" by the patient/caregiver. CLINICAL
trial registrationNCT04535531 (registered 2 September, 2020).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.