Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36287247›Full record

ArticleActa biotheoretica2022

On the Role of Speed in Technological and Biological Information Transfer for Computations.

János Végh, Ádám József Berki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biotheoretica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

János VéghKalimános BT, Debrecen, 4032, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3247-7810
Ádám József Berki *Department of Neurology, Semmelweis University, 1085, Budapest, Hungary. berki.adam@med.semmelweis-univ.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7099-167X

Funding

Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap 136496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In all kinds of implementations of computing, whether technological or biological, some material carrier for the information exists, so in real-world implementations, the propagation speed of information cannot exceed the speed of its carrier. Because of this limitation, one must also consider the transfer time between computing units for any implementation. We need a different mathematical method to consider this limitation: classic mathematics can only describe infinitely fast and small computing system implementations. The difference between mathematical handling methods leads to different descriptions of the computing features of the systems. The proposed handling also explains why biological implementations can have lifelong learning and technological ones cannot. Our conclusion about learning matches published experimental evidence, both in biological and technological computing.

Indexed as

MathematicsAnimalsBiological computingComputing paradigmInformation storageInformation transfer speedLifelong learningMachine learningRedundancyTechnological computingTemporal behavior

Identifiers

PMID36287247
PMCPMC9606061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.