Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36287225›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

No difference in clinical outcome after rotator cuff repair performed within or later than 3 months after trauma: a retrospective cohort study.

Sigbjørn Dimmen, Christian Owesen, Kirsten Lundgreen, Kjersti Kaul Jenssen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Timing of surgical repair for traumatic rotator cuff tears.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sigbjørn DimmenOrthopaedic Department, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Postboks 4970 Nydalen, 0440, Oslo, Norway. sigbjorn.dimmen@medisin.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5703-0273
Christian OwesenOrthopaedic Department, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Postboks 4970 Nydalen, 0440, Oslo, Norway.
Kirsten LundgreenOrthopaedic Department, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Postboks 4970 Nydalen, 0440, Oslo, Norway.
Kjersti Kaul JenssenOrthopaedic Department, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Postboks 4970 Nydalen, 0440, Oslo, Norway.
Lovisenberg Diakonale Høgskole · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRotator cuff (RC) tear is one of the most common injuries of the shoulder. Patients with RC tears often report a trauma initiating shoulder pain and impaired function. The aim of this retrospective analysis of a prospectively registered cohort was to elucidate whether the time interval between the trauma and RC repair, using a cut off of 3 months, affects the functional outcome after 2 years.

methodsIn a single orthopedic unit, 819 consecutive patients were treated with rotator cuff repair during the period from 2010 to 2014 and 733 of the patients completed the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index preoperatively and at 2-year follow-up. The Constant-Murley (CM) score was completed by trained physiotherapists after a clinical examination both preoperatively and at 2-year follow-up. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in all patients and postoperatively in 65% of the included patients. Re-tears and partial repairs were excluded, as were patients with pseudoparalysis who were given high priority and underwent surgery during the first 3 weeks after trauma.

resultsOf the 733 treated patients, 437 (60%) reported having had a shoulder trauma in their medical history initiating their shoulder symptoms, and of these, 358 met the inclusion criteria. 296 patients with non-traumatic tears, 9 repairs done within 3 weeks after trauma, 25 partial repairs, 33 re-tears and 12 others were excluded. At 2-year follow-up there was no significant difference in WORC index (n.s.) or CM score (n.s.) between patients who had their RC repaired within or more than 3 months after trauma. In patients where RC repair was performed within 3 months, the WORC index improved by 42.9%, and in the group of patients operated later than 3 months, the increase was 38.7%. This difference between the groups was neither statistically significant (n.s.) nor clinically relevant. On postoperative MRI, 80% of the repairs were healed in both groups.

conclusionIn this retrospective cohort study, no differences in clinical outcome were found when RC repair was performed between 3 weeks and 3 months or later than 3 months after injury in patients describing their onset of symptoms as traumatic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Rotator CuffRotator Cuff InjuriesArthroplastyArthroscopyHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeArthroscopic rotator cuff repairDelayed repairEarly repairShoulder functionTraumatic rotator cuff tear

Identifiers

PMID36287225
PMCPMC9898400
OpenAlexW4307344396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.